Securities Lawyers Blog

Gana LLP Investigates UBS Puerto Rico, Popular Securities, and Santander Securities Sales of Puerto Rican Bond Funds

October 8, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The steep decline in prices of Puerto Rican bonds has caused local investors substantial investment losses in assets that many are claiming were sold to them as safe and secure bonds. According to a New York Times article, Puerto Rico’s woes stem from the fact that its 3.7 million residents have approximately $87 billion of debt outstanding (about $23,000 of debt for every man, woman, and child) and spiraling pension costs. Further, Puerto Rico has experienced a rapidly declining population and double-digit unemployment causing the debt to be left behind to a smaller and poorer population to shoulder the debt burden.

Bond losses have been so great that Puerto Rico has been effectively shut out of the bond market and is now financing its operations with bank credit and other short-term measures that are unsustainable. The commonwealth’s bonds are widely held by local mutual funds issued by Puerto Rico’s largest brokerage firms including UBS Puerto Rico, Popular Securities, Inc., and Santander Securities, Corp. If the situation continues to worsen some fear that Puerto Rico will need some sort of federal action and bailout, an action without precedent.

Investor loss estimate tied to the bond fund sell-off have reached hundreds of millions of dollars. However, an accurate tally of the total damages is impossible at this time. Some investors have begun filing claims against their brokerage firm claiming that the losses have substantially or completely wiped out their retirement savings. These investors have claimed that their brokerage firm sold the bond funds as safe, stable, income producing investments. However, the bond funds not only had concentrated credit risk in Puerto Rican securities but also, in the case of the UBS leveraged funds, employed leverage of over 53%, exacerbating the losses. Comparatively, municipal bond funds domiciled in the United States are allowed to use only about half as much leverage as employed by the UBS funds.

FINRA Bars Broker Over Allegations of Churning (Excessive Trading) and Unauthorized Trading in Customer Accounts

October 7, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has barred Chad David Kelly (Kelly) concerning allegations of churning (excessive trading) and unauthorized trading. “Churning” is excessive investment trading activity that serves little useful purpose or is inconsistent with the investor’s objectives and is conducted solely to generate commissions for the broker. Churning is also a type of securities fraud.

FINRA alleged that Kelly willfully violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act of 1934”), Rule 10b-5, and violated FINRA Rules 2020, and 2010, NASD Rules 2120, 2110, 2310, and IM-2310(a) and (b).

According to FINRA, excessive trading violation occurs when: 1) a broker has control over the account and the trading in the account, and 2) the level of activity in that account is inconsistent with the customer’s objectives and financial situation. Where an intent to defraud or reckless disregard for the customer’s interests is present the activity is also churning. Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 prohibits the use of “any manipulative or deceptive act or practice” in connection with the purchase or sale of a security and Rule 10b-5 prohibits “any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud.” NASD Rule 2310(a) provides that when recommending the purchase, sale, or exchange of any security a broker “shall have reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable for such customer…” A broker’s recommendations must “be consistent with his customer’s best interests.” NASD IM-2310-2(a)(1) also require that the broker must “’have reasonable grounds to believe that the number of recommended transactions within a particular period is not excessive.” NASD IM-2310-2(b)(2) prohibits brokers from excessively trading in customer accounts.

Former Waddell & Reed and Merrill Lynch Stockbroker Fined and Suspended for Misconduct

October 6, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

FINRA has fined Maryland financial adviser and investment counselor Jill Meredith Carr $10,000 and suspended her for two years from the securities industry. According to the letter of acceptance, waiver and consent (“AWC”) submitted by Ms. Carr, she entered the securities industry in 2007 with Merrill Lynch until her termination for “failure to meet performance standards” in 2008. She then worked for Waddell & Reed, Inc until her termination in July 2012 when she was terminated for forging customer signatures. Brokers and investment advisers the forge customer signatures constitute a form of securities fraud.

According to the AWC, from December 2011 through June 2012, Carr forged signatures of at least 15 Waddell & Reed customers on at least 24 forms. Carr also altered information on other account forms after the forms were signed by the customers. Specifically, in connection with firm-required suitability updates, Carr forged the signatures of at least six customers on at least 12 update forms without their knowledge, consent, or authorization. In addition, she forged at least five additional signatures, allegedly as an accommodation to those customers. By forging the signatures, FINRA found that Carr violated FINRA Rule 2010. Finra Rule 2010 states that “A member, in the conduct of its business, shall observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade.”

Pursuant to FINRA Rules, brokerage firms rely on customers’ stated objectives and profiles to determine whether the investment objectives and the broker recommendations are consistent. It is important that investors and their brokers fully understand these objectives. It is imperative that these objectives be properly stated. Here, FINRA’s fine and suspension reflects the importance of these documents.

Announcement: David I. Wax Joins Gana LLP

October 4, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Gana Weinstein LLP is pleased to announce that it has added David I. Wax as of counsel to the firm. Mr. Wax brings to the firm significant experience managing complex commercial litigation matters from inception and discovery through motion practice and trial. Mr. Wax has represented a variety of clients over the course of his career, from individual investors to large financial institutions. Mr. Wax’s current practice focuses on providing outside general counsel services to rapidly growing small businesses as well as general litigation. By adding Mr. Wax as of Counsel, Gana Weinstein LLP has strengthens its core securities arbitration & litigation practice and diversifies its practice.

Retired Auto Executive Sues UBS for $30 Million for Investment Fraud Related to Puerto Rican Bonds

October 3, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

On October 1, 2013, Victor Gómez, Jr. a retired auto executive filed an action against UBS for investment fraud related to Puerto Rican bonds. According to the Caribbean News, this is the first of many legal actions expected to be filed in FINRA against UBS Financial Services, Inc. Mr. Gómez and his family are seeking $30 million in restitution for their investment losses, attorneys’ fees, punitive damages, and other costs. Gómez and his family claim that UBS designed an unsuitable investment strategy, never properly disclosed the risks, and implemented an “illicit and fraudulent scheme perpetrated to generate exorbitant profits… in utter disregard of the best interests of claimants, public interest and applicable laws and regulations.”

According to the Caribbean News, the statement of claim names: “UBS Financial Services Inc.; UBS Bank USA; UBS financial consultants and investment executives José M. Ramirez and Carlos Freire Borges; UBS senior officer Doel García; UBS Puerto Rico CEO Carlos Ubiñas; and other unidentified UBS officials.”

According to sources, the funds at issue were:

Adam Gana Selected to the National Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers

October 1, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Adam Gana is selected to the National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers. The attorneys selected for this prodigious honor are selected by invitation-only and is composed of the premier trial lawyers from each state in the nation who meet detailed and mandatory qualifications as civil plaintiff and/or criminal defense trial lawyers. Selection is based on a multi-phase process which includes peer nominations combined with third-party research. Membership is extended only to the select few of the most qualified attorneys from each state who demonstrate superior qualifications of leadership, reputation, influence, stature and public profile.

According to the National Trial Lawyers each member of the top 100 members posses the knowledge, skill, experience and success held by the finest and best attorneys in America. The National Trial Lawyers is devoted to protecting and preserving justice for all. Through networking and legal seminars, The National Trial Lawyers provides a competitive edge to attorneys already at the top of their field. To learn more about Mr. Gana’s nomination please visit:

http://www.thenationaltriallawyers.org/profile-view/Adam/Gana/4471/

Larry Dearman and Others charged by the SEC for Fraud

September 30, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Larry J. Dearman (Dearman), Sr. Marya Gray (Gray), Bartnet Wireless Internet Inc., The Property Shoppe, Inc., and Quench Buds Holding Company LLC. Dearman and Gray allegedly created an illegal scheme that fraudulently raised at least $4.7 million from thirty (30) of Deaman’s advisory clients. Dearman promised the clients that their money would be invested into lucrative investments. However, according to the SEC, Dearman and Gray squandered the funds by gambling, paying for personal expenses, and making payments to other businesses controlled by Gray.

Dearman is currently not registered as a broker with FINRA; however Dearman was registered with various brokerage firms from 2005 until 2012. From April 2002 until February 2005 Dearman was registered with the firm AXA Advisors, LLC. Upon leaving AXA Advisors, Dearman joined Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. until January 2009. From January 2009 until February 2010 Dearman joined Securities America, Inc. Finally, Dearman was a broker with Cambridge Legacy Securities LLC from February 2010 until May 2012.

The SEC Complaint explains between December 2008 and August 2012 Dearman raised $1.7 million through the sale of promissory notes for Bartnet, a wireless internet service, whose majority shareholder was Gray. In addition, Dearman raised $2 million for a second Gray-controlled company, the Property Shoppe. Finally, in 2012 Dearman recommended his clients invest in Quench Buds, four convenient stores owned by Gray. Instead of investing the capital raised, Dearman and Gray allegedly allocated the funds to personal gambling expenses and payments to investors in the ponzi scheme.

Diego Hernandez of AXA Advisors Accused of Misusing Customer Funds

September 30, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Diego Fernando Hernandez (Hernandez) was recently barred from the financial industry by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning allegations that he failed to disclose outside business activities, a practice known in the industry as “selling away” and misused customer funds.

Hernandez entered the securities industry in May 1998. In August 2005, Hernandez became a registered representative of AllState Insurance Company until April 2012. In April 2012, Hernandez became a registered representative of AXA Advisors, LLC (AXA) until February 2013. On Hernandez’s public securities disclosures he is listed as the owner of H.D. Mile High Marketing a marketing, advertising, and banner company located in Lakewood, Colorado. In February 2013, AXA filed a termination notice for Hernandez disclosing that his employment was terminated by the firm for failure to comply with the firm’s policies and FINRA’s rules in connection with undisclosed outside business activity and the commingling and conversion of customer funds.

While Hernandez was associated with AXA, FINRA alleged that he engaged in at least three outside business activities that were not disclosed to or approved by the firm. In March 2012, Hernandez filed articles of organization, forming Wealth Management Partners LLC (Wealth Management Partners) where Hernandez serves as Wealth Management’s president and chief executive officer. In February 2010, Hernandez formed Team Cure Racing as a nonprofit corporation under the laws of Colorado. In November 2009, Hernandez formed DFHR Investments, Inc. (DFHR Investments) under the laws of Colorado. Hernandez is the president of DFHR Investments. Hernandez filed the Wealth Management Partners, Team Cure Racing, and DFHR Investments corporate formation documents before he joined AXA.

Robert Gist Fined $5.4 Million by the SEC and Barred From the Financial Industry

September 29, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Robert Gist (Gist) was recently fined $5.4 million by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and barred from association with any broker-dealer by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Gist has been accused by both regulators of converting the funds of at least 30 customers in order to pay personal expenses and to fund the operations of a company controlled by Gist.

Gist resides in Atlanta, Georgia and is the president of Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc., (Gist Kennedy) a law firm specializing in estate planning and investments. Gist is licensed to practice law in Georgia and has represented professional athletes as a sports agent. From approximately 2002 through early 2013, Gist was CEO and president ENCAP Technologies, LLC (ENCAP), a company with its principal place of business in Roswell, Georgia. ENCAP is in the business of developing industrial coatings for metal surfaces to prevent corrosion. Gist has been associated or registered with numerous brokerage firms since the 1980s. Most recently, Gist was registered with Resource Horizons Group LLC from March 2001 until his December 2011.

On May 31, 2013, the SEC charged Gist and Gist Kennedy with defrauding at least 32 customers out of at least $5.4 million while acting as an unregistered broker from approximately 2003 to the present. According to the SEC’s complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Gist told customers that he would invest their funds conservatively on their behalves in corporate bonds and other securities. However, according to the SEC Gist invested none of the customer funds, but, instead, used the funds for his personal expenses.

How To Guide: Tips on Avoiding Investment Scams

September 28, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

You read about investment scams, but you never think it can happen to someone like you.

We have all read about the Bernie Madoffs and Allen Stanfords of the world. Unsuspecting investors duped into some of the largest ponzi schemes in the world. You think to yourself that it can never happen to you or anyone you know – that you are too smart. You may be right, but a lot of victims are smart and sophisticated investors. The lure of safe investments with high returns is appealing to everyone. Don’t get caught chasing returns in investments you do not understand.

High Yield and No Risk