Securities Lawyers Blog

Ameriprise Advisor Michael Hainsworth Sanctioned Over Misleading REIT Sales

May 29, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned Ameriprise Financial Services (Ameriprise) broker Michael Hainsworth (Hainsworth) concerning allegations that the broker made certain misrepresentations and unbalanced statements in the sale of non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs) by sending emails to potential investors that failed to provide a sound basis for evaluating the facts.

Hainsworth has been a broker in the securities industry since 1994. From 2007 through June 2009 Hainsworth was associated with Prime Capital Services, Inc. Thereafter, he was associated with brokerage firm Securities America, Inc. from July 2009 through September 2011. Finally, he was associated with Ameriprise from May 2009, through April 2012. Thereafter, Ameriprise filed a Form U5 Uniform Termination Notice stating that Hainsworth had been terminated from Ameriprise.

FINRA alleged that between May and October 2010, Hainsworth sent emails regarding a REIT to four potential investors. FINRA found that the emails were misleading and failed to provide a sound basis for evaluating the facts of the investment. In one email, Hainsworth stated that “My recommendation is to take $50,000 out of the market in your Trust account and $50,000 out of your IRA and allocate it to the…REIT…This pays 6.25 and matures Dec 3lst, 2015.”

Former MML Investors and AXA Advisors Broker Monte Miron Barred From Brokerage Industry

May 28, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned MML Investors Services, LLC (MML Investors a/k/a MassMutual Life Insurance Company) broker Monte Miron (Miron) concerning allegations that Miron made unauthorized trades in client accounts and that the broker failed to disclose certain tax liens on his Form U4 in a timely manner.

Miron first became registered with member firm Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. in September 1982. Miron has been registered with 11 firms between October 1998 and August 2012. From 2005 to January 2008, Miron was associated with MetLife Securities Inc. From December 2007 through September 2012, Miron was a representative with AXA Advisors, LLC.

According to Miron’s brokerage disclosures the broker has had three customer complaints filed against him. The complaints involve allegations of account manipulation, excessive trading, and a misrepresentation concerning a variable annuity.

Broker Jeffrey Schrader Barred Over Selling Away Allegations

May 27, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred broker Jeffrey Schrader (Schrader) concerning allegations that the broker engaged in private securities transactions and failed to cooperate with FINRA’s investigation.

Schrader entered the industry in June 1998. From November 2005, until March 2009, Schrader was associated with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. In March 2009, Schrader became associated with Western International Securities, Inc. (Western). Schrader conducts securities transactions on through his own business, Schrader Wealth Management.

FINRA found that between 2009 and 2010 Schrader, while associated with Western, engaged in over $145,000 worth of private securities transactions with three investors without providing written notice or receiving approval from Western. FINRA alleged that two of the nine investors were customers of Western at the time that their investment was made away from the firm.

FSC Securities Broker Timothy Moran Barred From Industry Over Involvement in Hampton Capital Management

May 23, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred FSC Securities Corporation (FSC Securities) broker Timothy Moran (Moran) concerning allegations that the broker: (1) engaged in private securities transactions without providing his employer with prior written notice; (2) failed to respond to FINRA requests for information; (3) provided false information to FINRA; and (4) failed to disclose a tax lien on a Form U4. Moran was ordered to disgorge $200,000, in ill-gotten gains in addition to the bar.

Moran was first became employed in the securities industry in February 1993. From June 2008, through April 2010, Moran was associated with Cambridge Investment Research, Inc. Thereafter, from May 2010, until December 2011, Moran was registered through his association with FSC Securities. On December 9, 2011, FSC Securities filed a Uniform Termination Notice (Form U5) terminating Moran’s registration. FSC filed an amended Form U5 filing in which the firm disclosed that it had terminated Moran’s employment while he was under internal review for fraud or wrongful taking of property, or violating investment-related statutes, regulations, rules or industry standards of conduct. FSC Securities also reported that Moran had referred clients to an unapproved investment fund.

FINRA alleged that Moran engaged in private securities transactions without providing FSC Securities with written notice in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 3040 and FINRA Conduct Rule 2010. During 2010, FINRA found that Moran subleased office space to Thomas Hampton. Hampton allegedly used the space to operate a private hedge fund, Hampton Capital Management (HCM). Moran was also found to have loaned Hampton money to help start HCM. HCM purportedly bought and sold exchange traded funds based on a proprietary trading strategy implemented by a computer program.

Mislead into Investing in Tenants-in-Common (TIC) Property?

May 22, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The sales of Tenants-in-Common (TIC) interests grew significantly during the early 2000s from approximately $150 million in 2001 to approximately $2 billion by 2004. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has noted that TICs are illiquid investments for which no secondary market exists and that subsequent sales of the property may occur at a discount to the value of the real property interest. FINRA has also warned that the risk that the fces and expenses charged by the TIC sponsor can outweigh the potential tax benefits associated with a Section 1031 Exchange. FINRA also instructed members that they have an obligation to comply with all applicable conduct rules when selling TICs by ensuring that promotional materials used are fair, accurate, and balanced.

According to FINRA former brokerage firm CapWest Securities, Inc., (CapWest) violated industry content standards in communications with the public. FINRA found that the communications: (1) were not fair and balanced and failed to provide a sound basis for evaluating TIC investments being promoted; (2) used exaggerated and or misleading statements; (3) used prohibited statements by projecting the results of the products being promoted; and (4) used customer testimonials without proper disclosures. FINRA also found that CapWest violated supervisory standards by failing to implement effective supervisory procedures. FINRA found that all of these violations and conduct were inconsistent with just and equitable principles of trade.

FINRA’s investigation involved CapWest’s promotion and sales of Section 1031 Exchanges and TIC investments that started being sold in the early 2000s. CapWest made public communications to promote tax-deferred exchanges of real property under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as well as TIC investments. The IRC permits an investor to defer paying capital gains tax on the sale of real estate held for use for investment by exchanging the investment for “like-kind” property of equal or greater value.

Sales of Non-Traded REITs Contributes to Increased Broker Dealer Revenues

May 21, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Despite the broad market’s recent volatility, 2013 brought the twenty-five largest independent broker dealers double-digit revenue growth on average, according to an Investment News report. After a weak 2012, these independent broker dealers roared to a 13.2% year over year increase in revenue, recording $18.46 billion in 2013 according to this year’s Investment News survey.

The overall strength of the S&P 500, gaining 29.6% in 2013 was one contributing factor to the 2013 success of independent broker dealers. The other factor however, was a flood of commissions generated from record sales of alternative investment products, namely non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs). As Eric Schwartz, chief executive of Cambridge Investment Research explained, “There were two reasons for last year’s results. The stock market was up 30%, and there was an unusually high percentage of dollars in alternatives and REITs being sold. Remember, a number of REITs had public listings, and clients reinvested back into other REITs.”

According to the Investment News survey, the top ten independent broker-dealers with the most growth from alternative investments include: (1) Independent Financial Group; (2) Triad Advisors; (3) Royal Alliance Associates; (4) National Planning Corp.; (5) First Allied Securities; (6) Lincoln Financial Network; (7) Cambridge Investment Research; (8) Commonwealth Financial Network; (9) Ameriprise Financial Services; 10) LPL Financial.

Wall Street Wants to Sell Private Equities to Average Joes

May 20, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

We now have the answer to what they will think up next. According to a New York Times article, one of Wall Street’s most exclusive investment products, sold to the wealthy, is moving toward the mainstream investor. Private equity funds. These vast pools of capital that buy and sell companies will become accessible to smaller investors if supports have their way under a plan being contemplated by the Nasdaq stock exchange.

The plan calls for a market where investors in private equity funds can sell their interests to individuals whose net worth falls short of the usual requirements for such investments. Today, private equity funds are limited by the Investment Company Act of 1940 limits their investors to “qualified purchasers,” or individuals with at least $5 million in investments.

Other rules that stand in the way of the sale of alternative investments to the masses include Regulations D. Under Regulation D, private placements can only be sold to “accredited investors.” Under Rule 501 an “accredited investor” is any person who has a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 — excluding residence — or has an annual income in excess of $200,000 in two most recent years.

LPL Financial Broker Reniero Francisco Accused of Misappropriating Millions in Client Funds

May 19, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred LPL Financial, LLC (LPL) broker Reniero Francisco (Francisco) concerning allegations that the broker failed to cooperate with FINRA’s investigation of Francisco’s involvement with Arista LLC, a registered Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) with its principal place of business in Newport Coast, California. An order was entered on December 3, 2013, requiring Francisco and other parties to pay more than $8.25 million in restitution for the losses of defrauded investors. FINRA requested information from Francisco and also scheduled him to testify but Francisco failed to respond to FINRA’s requests for information and documents and also failed to appear for testimony.

In December 2012, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) brought action against Arista and Arista’s principals, Abdul Sultan Walji (a/k/a Abdul Sultan Valji) of San Juan Capistrano, California, and Francisco alleging that they carried out a fraudulent scheme to misappropriate millions of investors’ money through commodity futures and options, making false statements to the CFTC, and filing false quarterly reports with the National Futures Association (NFA).

Shortly thereafter, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a consent judgment and permanent injunction order against Arista, Walji, and Francisco. The order requires the defendants to pay more than $8.25 million in restitution for the investor losses. In addition, the order imposed civil monetary penalties of $6.45 million on Walji, $5.925 million on Francisco, and $1.54 million on Arista. The order also permanently bans defendants from trading activity and prohibits them from violating provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) and a CFTC regulation.

FINRA Drops Bid to Regulate Investment Advisors – For Now

May 16, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Most people do not realize that there is a big distinction between brokers and investment advisors. Many people think, they both recommend securities. While that is true, that is pretty much where the similarities end.

A broker is regulated by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) a self-regulatory organization (SRO) as provided for under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. On the other hand investment advisors are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission as provided under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 (IAA).

A broker is more akin to salesman. A broker’s obligation is to make sure that his or her recommendation is suitable and appropriate for the investor given the investors objectives and other information. However, an investment advisor is more like an appraiser of securities, his or her job is not only to make recommendations that are not only suitable but to continually monitor the investors account to ensure that the investor has a viable financial plan over time. Consequently, a broker is compensated on a transactional basis while an investment advisor is paid a percentage of the assets managed by the advisor.

Two MetLife Advisors Alleged to Have Wrongfully Exchanged Variable Annuities

May 14, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

On March 27, 2014, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) filed a regulatory complaint against two former brokers from MetLife Securities, Inc., a unit of MetLife Inc. According to the complaint, Christopher Birli (Birli) and Patrick Chapin (Chapin), who both worked for MetLife in Williamsville, New York, until 2012, participated in a seven-year scheme to inflate commissions. According to the allegations, the advisors preyed on the employees of the State University of New York, having these retirement-plan participants switch $21 million in annuities. The specific allegations claim that from a period spanning from 2004 to 2011, Birli and Chapin encouraged forty-five of their customers to switch the MetLife variable annuities that they held in their respective accounts in exchange for new variable annuities held in individual retirements accounts, which were outside of the university plan that the State University of New York employees should have adhered to.

MetLife has certain policies in place. One such policy prohibits exchanging certain types of variable annuities. It has been alleged that the two MetLife advisors deceptively designed the deals for their customers in a manner explicitly intended to circumvent this policy. Birli and Chapin allegedly evaded detection by utilizing a three-step process. First, they advised their clients to sell their retirement plan annuities and take the cash. Next, the two advisors had their clients purchase a different security within the retirement plan, which they were required to hold for ninety days. Finally, Birli and Chapin instructed their clients to sell that security in order to buy a variable annuity through an individual retirement account.

Over the seven-year period, a total of $21 million was craftily shifted from the MetLife retirement plan product into the TIAA-CREF plan product, then subsequently placed into the MetLife retail annuities. All the while, Birli and Chapin allegedly reaped commissions of 7.15% for transferring the money into the retail annuities. If the two brokers had followed protocol and sought an exception with MetLife to allow the internal exchange of the retirement plan annuity product for a retail variable annuity, they would have only earned the standard 2% gross dealer concessions. The advisors’ alledged improprieties essentially netted them nearly four times the commissions that they were rightfully entitled to, generating hundreds of thousands of dollars for their own pockets. According to the filings, MetLife terminated Birli and Chapin in 2012. Neither individual presently works in the securities industry, according to filings.