Articles Tagged with Selling Away

shutterstock_180735251The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred broker Robert Acri (Acri) concerning allegations that in December 2013, and January 2014, Acri failed to fully respond to a Rule 8210 request for documents and information concerning Acri’s sale of alternative investments and promissory notes.

Acri first entered the securities industry in 1988. From December 2007 through April 2009, Acri was associated with Chicago Investment Group, LLC. After that, he was representative with Spyglass Securities, LLC from June 2010 through June 2011. Acri was last associated with World Equity Group, Inc. from June 25, 2012 through June 6, 2013. World Equity Group terminated Acri by a Form U5 filed on June 10, 2013.

According to Acri’s BrokerCheck Acri listed his outside business activities as being involved in The Synergy Fund, Synergy Private Capital Fund, Kam Private Fund all of which is listed as investment related. In addition, the disclosures state that Acri is the president of IRCA Coporation.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced approval of amendments to FINRA’s supervision rule that would expand the obligations of brokerage firms to check the background of applicant brokers upon registration.  The rule would encompass first-time applications as well as transfers between firms and require the brokerage firm to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in an applicant’s Form U4.  Under the new rule brokerage firms must adopt written procedures in their supervisory manuals that include searching public records in order to check the accuracy of the information.  The amendments to the supervision rule will be submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission for review and approval.

shutterstock_153912335The U4 Form is the foundation of FINRA’s BrokerCheck system that helps investors find red flags that would indicate potential problems and signs of misconduct by their brokers.  FINRA’s BrokerCheck come under fire recently by investor advocacy groups and federal lawmakers for its inaccuracies and lack of complete information.

In addition, FINRA will also search public financial records for all registered representatives and also search other publicly available information including criminal records of brokers.  FINRA intends to conduct periodic reviews of public records to ensure that the organizations BrokerCheck database and information is accurate.  Also under consideration is whether to add additional information to a broker’s publically available Central Registration Depository such as broker scores on securities exams.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Marylin T. Meyers (Myers) $20,000 and barred her for two years concerning allegations between September 2009, and February 2011, she participated in a series of private securities transactions totaling approximately $1,000,000 without notifying her firm, Allstate Financial Services, LLC (Allstate) or obtaining the firm’s written approval. FINRA alleged that Meyers recommended that five investors invest in On The Edge and she helped facilitate their purchases of On the Edge Notes.  On The Edge is a California based company formed to be a supplier of consumer goods such as tents, folding chairs, wagons, and promotional items related to retailers.  To date, On The Edge has failed to repay the principal and interest due to the investors.

Meyers first became registered with FINRA in 1986 with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenncr & Smith Incorporated.  In 2001, Meyers became associated with Metlife Securities Inc.  Thereafter, in July 2004, Meyers joined Allstate until her termination on May 17, 2012.

The allegations against Meyers are typical of a “selling away” violation.  A broker sells away from their brokerage firm when they solicit securities that were not approved by the broker’s affiliated firm or recorded on the firm’s books and records.  NASD Rule 3040 requires an associated person to provide written notice to the firm prior to participating in any private securities transaction. An associated person is prohibited from participating in any manner in the private securities transaction without the Firm’s approval.  Under FINRA Rule 3010, brokerage firms are required to supervise their brokers and implement supervisory procedures reasonably designed to detect and prevent violations of NASD Rule 3040.

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP recently filed a complaint with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on behalf of a former NFL athlete alleging that the brokerage firm Resource Horizons Group LLC (Resource Horizons) failed to supervise Robert Gist (Gist), one of the firm’s associated persons.

The claimant came to know Gist in the 1980s while playing in the NFL.  The claimant knew that his NFL earnings would provide him with enough money to save for his retirement and support his lifestyle after retiring from the NFL and wanted Mr. Gist to prudently manage the funds.  The claimant trusted Gist through many years of friendship and Gist was invited to the claimant’s family events and functions.

In 1991, Gist solicited the claimant to continue to invest with him at his new firm, Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc, (Gist, Kennedy) which also operated as a law firm.  According to the complaint, Gist told the claimant that he could invest the couple’s retirement assets and an educational trust the claimant established for the benefit of their children and produce an income of between 7 to 10%.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Center Street Securities, Inc. (Center Street) concerning allegations that the firm failed to establish, maintain, and enforce adequate supervisory systems and written supervisory procedures to monitor the use of external email accounts to conduct firm-related business by the firm’s registered representatives.  The firm was fined $30,000.

Center Street has been a FlNRA member since February 7, 1991 and employs approximately 84 registered persons out of 74 branch offices.  Center Street’s principal office is in Nashville, Tennessee.  Center Street sells variable life insurance and annuities, mutual funds, private placements, options, corporate equities, debt securities, U.S. government securities and municipal securities.

The duty to supervise is a critical component of the securities regulatory scheme.  The duty to supervise is an affirmative responsibility of all brokerage firms.  The SEC has found that effective supervision by a broker-dealer must provide effective staffing, efficient resources and a system of follow-up and review to determine that any responsibility to supervise is being diligently exercised.  Evidence that there is a variance between the conduct called for by a firm’s procedures and the actions actually undertaken by a firm supports a finding of liability and failure to supervise.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned brokerage firm Cambridge Investment Research, Inc. concerning allegations that from January 2009, to July 2010, Cambridge failed to ensure that the firm preserved, maintained, and reviewed the business emails of two of its registered representatives.  FINRA found that during this time Cambridge was relying upon its representatives to forward copies of their emails but did not have effective procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the representatives actually forwarded emails in violation of FINRA supervision rules.

Cambridge has been a FINRA member since December 1995 and has 3,044 registered individuals in 1,530 branch offices.

The duty to supervise has been held to be a critical component of the securities regulatory scheme.  Supervisors have an obligation to employ systems and processes designed to ferret out wrongful behavior.  In addition, firms must respond vigorously to indications of irregularity, commonly referred to as “red flags” of misconduct.

Broker Donald R. Dahn (Dahn) has been barred by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) concerning allegations that he privately borrowed money from at least two customers, an act constituting securities fraud, while being a registered representative of Mutual Service Corporation (MSC) and LPL Financial LLC (LPL).

Dahn entered the securities industry in September 1991, as an Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Representative (Series 6) license holder.  A Series 6 license allows a broker to recommend only a limited number of securities including variable annuities and open-end mutual funds.  From 1998 through 2009, Dahn was associated with MSC.  In 2009, MSC was acquired by LPL and Dahn became registered with LPL until his termination in April 2013.  On April 29, 2013, LPL submitted a Form U5 for Dahn.

Dahn has a long history of customer disputes and FINRA regulatory actions.  On December 5, 2012, FINRA found that Dahn violated FINRA rules by borrowing a total of $240,000 from three customers while he was employed with MSC and failing to obtain approval from his member firm for the loans.  At that time Dahn was suspended from the industry for six months.  In addition, there have been six customer disputes filed against Dahn.  The majority of the complaints involve allegations that clients loaned Dahn funds to keep his business operating.  At least one complaint alleges that Dahn made unsuitable variable annuity switches.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a complaint against broker Jamie Diaz (Diaz) concerning allegations that form December 2009, through November 2011, Diaz engaged in securities fraud through deceptive and manipulative devices to convert approximately $850,000 from four customers.  FINRA alleges that Diaz also converted $50,000 from a registered representative who worked with Diaz’s at National Securities Corporation (“National Securities”).

According to FINRA, Diaz told customers that their funds would be used to invest in two new restaurants in New York City and told another customer that the funds would be invested in real estate in New York City and a resort in Bermuda.  However, FINRA alleged that Diaz did not invest the funds as he had represented to his customers.  Instead, FINRA alleges that Diaz converted the funds for his personal use including to paying expenses related to his branch office business and to pay earlier investors.

Diaz first became employed in the securities industry in November 2000.  Thereafter, from 2003 through 2007, Diaz was registered with GunnAllen Financial, Inc. (“GunnAllen”).  From July 2007 through December 2011, Diaz was associated with National Securities.  According to Diaz’s BrokerCheck Diaz was also associated with or employed by Worldwide Asset Protection, an insurance and estate planning company, Worldwide Wealth Management, Worldwide Asset Management, The Water Initiative LLC, and Nuela Restaurant LLC.

The Division of Law of the New Jersey Bureau of Securities has filed suit and taken administrative action against George J. Bussanich, 55, of Park Ridge and his son, George Bussanich, 34, of Upper Saddle River alleging they engaged in securities fraud in connection with sales to 26 New Jersey of $3.5 million of unregistered notes.  The Bussanichs allegedly used the investor funds for their own personal enrichment.  New Jersey also alleged that George J. Bussanich also provided funds to various members of his family as well.  New Jersey alleged that investor funds were used to purchase three homes and exotic vehicles including two Maseratis and a Ferrari.

According to New Jersey, investors were told that their money would be used for Metropolitan Ambulatory Surgical Center, LLC (Metro Ambulatory) and George J. Bussanich’s other companies.  Contrary to its name, Metro Ambulatory is not a surgical center but rather a holding company controlled by George J. Bussanich.  New Jersey stated that the notes sold to investors purchased carried a 6% to 8% annual rate of return.

Acting New Jersey Attorney General John J. Hoffman said “This was not a legitimate investment gone bad but a scam by the defendants to line their pockets and live the high life.”  New Jersey filed an Order to Show Cause with the Court asking the Court to freeze the assets of the defendants, appoint a receiver to take title to and possession of defendants’ property, and review all financial books and records.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned Bedminster Financial Group, Ltd. (BFG) and Robert M. Van Pelt (Van Pelt).  FINRA alleged that at least four representatives of BFG used non-BFG email accounts for securities related communications to the public, customers and prospective customers and that Van Pelt failed to retain and review these emails. FINRA also found that BFG, through its President and Chief Compliance Officer Van Pelt, failed to enforce its written supervisory procedures by failing to 1) preserve business related emails; 2) review of business related mail; 3) inspect of non-branch offices; and 4) review and approve website content.

BFG’s main office is located in Holicong, Pennsylvania.  BFG employs thirty-four registered persons, had six registered branch offices, and twenty-eight non-branch offices located across the country.  BFG’s primary business is the receipt of finder’s fees for private placements and Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE) offerings.  Since 1996, Van Pelt has been registered with BFG and is the firm’s President, CCO, and majority owner.

The securities laws require firms to maintain and preserve for at least three years originals of all communications received and copies of all communications sent relating to the firm’s business.  BFG’s supervisory procedures required representatives to use the firm’s email account for business related communications and prohibited employees from communicating with customers or prospects through their personal email accounts unless the outside account was first approved by the firm and records of the email activity were provided to the firm. Despite BFG’s prohibition against using personal email addresses, FINRA found that at least four representatives used their unapproved personal email accounts for business-related communications without copying or forwarding these emails to the firm.

Contact Information