Articles Tagged with Oppenheimer

shutterstock_102757574According to the records kept by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Wade Lawrence (Lawrence) has been suspended following the broker’s failure to comply with an arbitration award or settlement and by failing to comply with the regulator’s request for information concerning compliance. In addition, FINRA permanently barred Lawrence for failing to respond to requests for information concerning allegations that he misappropriated funds from customers.

Lawrence first became registered with FINRA in 2002 with MML Investors Services, LLC. Thereafter, from June 2008 through July 2011, Lawrence was registered with Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (Oppenheimer) Finally from August 4, 2011, until December 2013, Lawrence was registered with Southwest Securities, Inc. (Southwest). On December 12, 2013, Southwest filed a Form U5 that terminated Lawrence’s registration.

In addition to the FINRA regulatory actions Lawrence has been the subject of at least nine customer disputes. These statistics are troubling because multiple customer complaints on a broker’s record are rare. According to InvestmentNews, only about 12% of financial advisors have any type of disclosure event on their records. FINRA’s disclosure records do not just cover customer complaints but also include IRS tax liens, judgments, and even criminal matters. The number of brokers with multiple customer complaints is far smaller.

shutterstock_89758564The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Stephen Campbell (Campbell) concerning allegations that the broker engaged in churning in a client account. Campbell has been a broker since 1978. From November 12, 2004 through November 12, 2013, Campbell was registered with Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (Oppenheimer).

Investment churning is trading activity characterized by purchasing and selling activity that is excessive and serves no practical purpose for the investor. Brokers engage in churning solely to generate commissions without regard for the client’s interests. In order to establish a churning claim the investor must show that the trading was first excessive and second that the broker had control over the investment strategy. Certain commonly used measures and ratios used to determine churning help evaluate a churning claim. These ratios look at how frequently the account is turned over plus whether or not the expenses incurred in the account made it unreasonable that the investor could reasonably profit from the activity.

In Campbell’s case, FINRA found that one of his customers was a 55 year old single mother who initially opened an account with Campbell in 2000. FINRA alleged that from January 2009, through September 2011, while exercising control over her accounts, Campbell excessively and unsuitable traded her accounts inconsistently with her investment objectives, financial situation and needs. FINRA determined that the trading activity resulted in an annualized turnover ratio of 15 and an annualized cost-to-equity ratio of 59% in her IRA account, and an annualized turnover ratio of 21 and an annualized cost-to-equity ratio of 120% in her individual account. During this period, FINRA determined that Campbell’s improper trading resulted in a collective loss of approximately $62,000, while generating total gross commissions of approximately $64,000.

shutterstock_114128113Back in Decmeber 2013, the law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP reported that “Former Ryan Beck and Oppenheimer Financial Advisor William Bucci Barred From the Financial Industry” where we reported that The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) barred Bucci for allegedly accepting 19 personal loans totaling $635,000 from nine customers in violation of FINRA rules. FINRA also alleged that Bucci willfully failed to amend his Form U4 to disclose material facts relating to two judgments that were entered against him. In addition to these claims, several customers filed complaints alleging that Bucci sold illegal promissory notes.

Recently, a combined investigation by the IRS and the FBI led to the filing of a federal complaint in the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania against Bucci in connection with the foregoing activities. The complaint alleged that Bucci willfully made Individual Income Tax Return, Form 1040, for the calendar years 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 that falsely understated his income.

In addition, a second superseding indictment was filed against Bucci on July 22, 2014, by the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging that Bucci was running an investment fraud scheme that deceived investors into turning over more than $3.2 million. According to a press release issued by the office, Bucci told his victims he was starting a wine and high end olive oil import business to import the goods from Italy. The release stated that Bucci was a licensed stockbroker and a non-lawyer elector on the Pennsylvania Court of Judicial Discipline who never had an olive oil and wine business. The release also alleged that Bucci also solicited individuals to loan money for the purchase of real estate. According to the indictment, Bucci used the funds to supplement his income and to support his lifestyle as well as to make payments to earlier victims.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently barred financial advisor William D. Bucci (Bucci) for allegedly accepting 19 personal loans totaling $635,000 from nine customers in violation of FINRA rules.  Bucci also allegedly willfully failed to amend his Form U4 to disclose material facts relating to two judgments that were entered against him.  In addition, customers have filed complaints alleging that Bucci sold illegal promissory notes.

Bucci has been licensed as registered securities representative since 1983.  From April 27, 2002, until April 2007, Bucci was a registered representative with Ryan Beck & Co. (Ryan Beck). Thereafter, and until August 2011, Bucci was registered with Oppenheimer & Co. (Oppenheimer).  Finally, from August 2011, until May 2012, Bucci was registered with Financial Network Investment Corp. (Financial Network).  Bucci’s public disclosures list that he is involved in a number of companies and other business activities including Delaware Valley Financial Group, LLC, DVFG Advisors, LLC, Chestnut Hill College Board of Trustees, Gennaro Vuono & William Bucci, 3010 Ocean Ave, LLC, 510 Seacliff LLC, 210 Sea Spay LLC, and 216 Sea Spay LLC.

FINRA alleged that between May 2004 and December 2010, Bucci accepted 19 personal loans from nine brokerage customers totaling $635,000.  FINRA found that all of the personal loans paid annual interest of at least 10 percent and had terms of up to five years.  In one instance, Bucci was accused of borrowing $425,000 in ten loan transactions from an elderly retired couple who were customers of Bucci at Ryan Beck and Oppenheimer.  FINRA alleged that none of the elderly couple’s loans have been repaid.  Further, according to FINRA, the elderly couple loaned Bucci a portion of the $425,000 by withdrawing money from their brokerage accounts and securing a second mortgage on their home.  FINRA found that Bucci’s conduct violated NASD Rules 2370 and 2110 and FINRA Rules 3240 and 2010.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has permanently barred broker Mark Christopher Hotton (Hotton) alleging that the broker engaged in numerous and repeated frauds including forgery, falsification of documents, conversion, misuse of funds, manipulating account records, churning, unauthorized trading, false testimony, and providing false information and documents to FINRA.

FINRA alleged that starting from at least 2006, Hotton engaged in numerous fraudulent investment schemes to steal at least $5,932,000 from his brokerage customers.  FINRA admitted that due to the complexity of the fraud that it had not been able to track down Hotton’s entire use and receipt of ill-gotten funds.  According to FINRA, Hotton converted funds from his customers by using his control over the bank accounts of various corporate entities to divert funds that his customers believed were being invested in legitimate businesses.

Fom November 2002 until November 2005, Hotton was associated with Ladenburg, Thalmann & Co., Inc., From November 2005 until February 2009, Hotton was associated with Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (Oppenheimer).  While at Oppenheimer, Hotton focused on clients with an average net worth of between $1,000,000 and $20,000,000.  Thereafter, Hotton was a registered representative of American Capital Partners, LLC until August 2010.  From September 2010 until March 2012, Hotton was associated with Alexander Capital, L.P.  Finally, from February 2012 until May 2012, Hutton was associated with Obsidian Financial Group, LLC.  Obsidian terminated Hotton’s registration on May 31, 2012.

Former Merrill, Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch), Deutsche Bank Securities (Deutsche Bank), Inc., and Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (Oppenheimer), broker Karl Edward Hahn (Hahn) was ordered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to pay former clients over $11 million for misconduct in April 2013.  Hahn was accused of common law fraud, negligent misrepresentations, and breach of fiduciary duties.

Hahn worked at Merrill Lynch from 2004 until 2008, at Deutsche Bank from 2008 to mid-2009, and at Oppenheimer from 2009 to early 2011.   Hahn allegedly recommended various unsuitable investments to customers including covered calls, a premium financed life insurance policy, and $2.3 million fraudulent real estate financing project “involving East Coast” properties.  Hahn allegedly recommended the life insurance policy for the the large commissions he stood to earn.  Hahn also allegedly pocketed the money that was supposedly going to finance the East Coast properties.

Other claims made against Hahn include churning of investment accounts.  Churning is a type of financial fraud where the broker engages in excessive trading in a client’s account for the purpose of generating commission but does not provide the investor with suitable investment strategy.

On May 6, 2013 the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) filed a complaint against Oppenheimer & Co. (Oppenheimer) for the sale of unregistered penny stock shares and for not having an adequate anti-money laundering (AML) compliance program to detect suspicious penny stock transactions.

On July 9, 2013 and August 5, 2013, Oppenheimer settled with FINRA agreeing to the sanctions and paying a fee of $1.4 million to resolve the charges brought in the complaint.  In agreeing to the settlement Oppenheimer neither admits nor denies any of the allegations made against the firm.

The alleged penny stock sales took place from August 19, 2008, through September 20, 2010. According to the settlement, the stocks were sold through seven brokers out of five different branch offices around the country.  These seven brokers reportedly sold over one billion shares of twenty penny stocks without registration or any applicable exemption from registration. Customers are said to have deposited “large blocks” of penny stock shortly after opening the accounts, then liquidated the accounts and transferred the proceeds out.

Contact Information