Gerald Repasz

There are Recent Customer Complaints with Broker Gerald Repasz in Firm Ausdal Financial Partners, INC.

July 21, 2026 | by Staff Attorney

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Gerald Repasz (Repasz), previously associated with Ausdal Financial Partners, INC., has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include 2 customer complaints, alleging that Repasz recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a settled customer complaint with a damage request of $100,000.00 on April 02, 2020.

Unsuitable investments

Broker Gerald Repasz in Ausdal Financial Partners, INC. Firm Has Customer Complaint

June 23, 2026 | by Staff Attorney

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Gerald Repasz (Repasz), previously associated with Ausdal Financial Partners, INC., has at least one disclosable event. These events include one customer complaint, alleging that Repasz recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a settled customer complaint with a damage request of $100,000.00 on April 02, 2020.

Unsuitable investments

Gerald Repasz Subject to Customer Disputes Alleging Unsuitable Alternative Investments

July 1, 2018 | by Staff Attorney

The investment fraud attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating Ausdal Financial Partners, Inc. (Ausdal Financial) broker Gerald Repasz (Repasz). According to BrokerCheck records, Repasz has been subject to 5 customer disputes, one of which still pending. The majority of these investments concern the unsuitable recommendation of alternative investments.

Most recently, in October 2017, a customer alleged that Repasz placed customers into UDF III, UDF IV, and Behringer Harvard REIT investments which were unsuitable to the customer’s investment objectives. The customer is requesting $62,000 in damages. This dispute is currently still pending.

In September 2016, a customer alleged that from 2005 to 2010, Repasz placed the customer in alternative investments that were unsuitable for the customer and misrepresented the material facts of the investments. The dispute was settled at $20,000.