Selling Away

FINRA Bars Broker Wayne Schultz Over Private Securities Transactions

March 31, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The investment lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory action brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) against Wayne Schultz (Schultz) (FINRA No. 2015044640601) of Branchburg, New Jersey. According to the FINRA action, Schultz consented to a bar from the securities industry after he failed to provide documents and information requested by FINRA during its investigation concerning certain notes that Schultz had issued to an elderly client. The selling of notes and other investments outside of a brokerage firm constitutes impermissible private securities transactions – a practice known in the industry as “selling away”.

At this time it unclear the nature and scope of Schultz’s outside business activities and private securities transactions. However, according to Schultz’s public records his outside business activities include a law practice. Often times, brokers sell promissory notes and other investments through side businesses as accountants, lawyers, or insurance to clients of those side practices.

Schultz was associated with brokerage firm TFS Securities, Inc. from September 2008 until December 2010. From January 2011 until June 2013 Schultz was registered with Sterne Agee Financial Services, Inc. Finally, from June 2013 until February 2016 Schultz was registered with Adirondack Trading Group LLC.

FINRA Bars Broker Robert Cross Over Private Securities Transactions

March 31, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The investment lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory action brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) against Robert Cross (Cross) (FINRA No. 2014041637201) of Rome, Georgia. Since August 2006, Cross was registered with Allstate Financial Services, LLC, where he resigned on June 28, 2013. On June 19, 2014, Allstate Financial Services filed a Form U5 amendment disclosing that a customer complaint had been filed against Respondent regarding Cross.

Thereafter, FINRA investigated Cross on the grounds that Allstate Financial Services’ Form U5 amendment stated that a customer complained of breach of contract, fraud, conversion, and negligence related to a collateralized bond obligation. FINRA’s investigation involved Cross’ outside business activities, financial reporting obligations, and whether Cross accepted unapproved loans from a customer while engaging in a private securities transaction – otherwise known in the industry as “selling away”. Thereafter, Cross refused to appear on the record to give testimony drawing an automatic bar from the financial industry.

At this time it unclear the nature and scope of Cross’ outside business activities and private securities transactions. However, according to Cross’ public records his outside business activities include Cross, Cross & Sims, Inc. and CCS Property.

FINRA Sanctions Ameriprise Financial Broker William Marshall and Supervisor John J. Kolinofsky, Jr. Over BioChemics Stock Sales

March 20, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The investment lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory action brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) against Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. (Ameriprise) broker William Marshall (Marshall) (FINRA No. 2012033291204) and his supervisor John J. Kolinofsky, Jr. (Kolinofsky) working out of the firm’s Plano, Texas office. According to the FINRA action against Marshall, from January 6, 2011 through May 2, 2012, Marshall participated in the sale of $1.72 million of privately issued preferred stock of BioChemics, Inc. (BioChemics) to his immediate firm supervisor, Kolinofsky, his Complex Manager, two other Ameriprise registered representatives, and several firm customers, all without having provided prior written notice to Ameriprise.

According to FINRA, Marshall received compensation for facilitating the private securities transactions in the form of common stock purchase warrants from BioChemics. Marshall is also alleged to serve as a member of BioChemics’ Scientific Advisory Board during his association with Ameriprise and received common stock purchase warrants from BioChemics as compensation. Moreover, FINRA found that Marshall used an unapproved personal e-mail account to communicate with firm customers about investing in BioChemics. FINRA also alleged that Marshall distributed sales literature prepared by BioChemics to investors that failed to disclose his business and personal financial interest in BioChemics and otherwise contained misleading, exaggerated, and/or unwarranted statements and inadequate risk disclosures.

BioChemics was later found to be an investment fraud. On December 14, 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a civil enforcement action in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against BioChemics. In March 2015, the District Court enjoined BioChemics from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and ordered BioChemics to pay over $17 million in disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest and $750,000 as a civil penalty.

FINRA Bars Raymond James Broker Jeffrey Ingros Over Outside Business Activities

March 19, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The investment lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory action brought by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) against Jeffrey Ingros (Ingros) (FINRA No. 2013039166001) working out of Beaver, Pennsylvania. According to the FINRA action, Ingros consented to a bar from the securities industry after he failed to provide information requested by FINRA during its investigation concerning undisclosed loans from a customer and outside business activities. The providing of loans or selling of notes and other investments outside of a brokerage firm constitutes impermissible private securities transactions – a practice known in the industry as “selling away”. In addition to the FINRA bar, Ingros has a long history of customer complaints and two employment separations for allegations of misconduct.

At this time it unclear the nature and scope of Ingros’ outside business activities and private securities transactions. However, according to Ingros’ public records his outside business activities include Fort McIntosh Group, LLC, Ingros Family, LLC, and Fort McIntosh Annuity & Insurance. Often times, brokers sell promissory notes and other investments through side businesses as accountants, lawyers, or insurance to clients of those side practices.

Ingros was associated with brokerage firm Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) from May 2007 until November 203. Finally, from November 2013 until February 2016 Ingros was registered with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (Raymond James).

FINRA Sanctions Broker Kevin Murphy Over Selling Away Allegations

March 9, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The securities fraud lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory complaint (Disciplinary No. 2015043159501) filed with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) against broker Kevin Murphy (Murphy). FINRA alleged that in or about November 2013, Murphy sold $1.2 million of shares and warrants in a private placement to four individuals and one limited partnership without his firm’s knowledge.

According to FINRA, in August and September, 2013, Murphy made a $1.2 million investment in a private placement for which TGP Securities, Inc. (TGP), Murphy’s brokerage firm, was providing brokerage services. In return for his investment, FINRA found that Murphy received two stock certificates totaling 600,000 Series F shares and two warrants exercisable for 300,000 common shares. On November 29, 2013, FINRA alleged that Murphy resold the Series F shares and the warrants to four individuals and one limited partnership for $1.2 million without the permission of TGP.

In the industry the term selling away refers to when a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or other securities that are not pre-approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. However, even though when these incidents occur the brokerage firm claims ignorance of their advisor’s activities the firm is obligated under the FINRA rules to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from offering investments in this fashion. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to have procedures in order to monitor the activities of each advisor’s activities and interaction with the public. Selling away misconduct often occurs where brokerage firms either fail to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fail to actually implement that system. Supervisory failures allow brokers to engage in unsupervised misconduct that can include all manner improper conduct including selling away.

FINRA Files Complaint Against Ricky Moore Over Church Bonds Selling Away Allegations

March 9, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The securities fraud lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory complaint (Disciplinary No. 2013038770901) filed with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) against broker Ricky Moore (Moore). FINRA alleged that between March 2012 and April 2013, while he was registered with Commonwealth Financial Network (Commonwealth Financial) Moore failed to disclose to the firm his outside business activities, also referred to as “selling away”, involving the facilitation of a church bond offering for a church located in Brazoria, Texas. In addition, to the FINRA complaint Moore has been subject to three customer complaints.

FINRA alleged in the complaint that Moore failed to disclose to his member firm his outside business activities involving the facilitation of a church bond offering for a church. The complaint alleges that Moore acted as the president and director of the church and facilitated the church bond offering for the church. In addition, FINRA found that Moore made a false and misleading statement on his firm’s annual compliance questionnaire when asked whether he had participated in raising capital, equity, or debt for a public or private investment. Moore answered “No” and also falsely stated that he had no undisclosed outside business activities. Thereafter, Commonwealth Financial conducted an investigation and Moore was permitted to resign after the firm terminated Moore’s registration.

In the industry the term selling away refers to when a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or other securities that are not pre-approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. However, even though when these incidents occur the brokerage firm claims ignorance of their advisor’s activities the firm is obligated under the FINRA rules to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from offering investments in this fashion. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to have procedures in order to monitor the activities of each advisor’s activities and interaction with the public. Selling away misconduct often occurs where brokerage firms either fail to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fail to actually implement that system. Supervisory failures allow brokers to engage in unsupervised misconduct that can include all manner improper conduct including selling away.

FINRA Sanctions Broker James Nixon Over Promissory Note Sales

March 7, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The securities fraud lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory complaint (Disciplinary No. 1013038289101) filed with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) against broker James Nixon (Nixon). FINRA alleged that Nixon failed to provide prior written notice to Bridge Capital Associates, Inc. (Bridge Capital), his then employing brokerage firm, before selling $600,000 of convertible promissory notes – practice referred to as “selling away” in the industry. FINRA found that Nixon provided detailed written notice to Bridge Capital only after he had already disseminated investor presentations to approximately 40 potential investors and completed sales to three accredited investor. In addition, FINRA alleged that Nixon provided investor presentations that contained exaggerated and misleading statements about the issuer of the promissory notes, by the initials BRT, and failed to include a meaningful risk disclosure.

Nixon entered the securities industry in 1987. Nixon was registered with Bridge Capital Associates since December 2007 until September 2013, when Bridge Capital discharged Nixon in connection with the conduct concerning FINRA’s allegations. Shortly after Bridge Capital terminated his registrations Nixon became registered with a different firm, Source Capital Group, Inc. out of the firm’s Westport, Connecticut office location.

FINRA found that the promissory notes were offered without a PPM and that instead the notes were offered through an investor PowerPoint presentation that Nixon prepared in conjunction with the issuer. FINRA found that the investor presentation was devoid of any cautionary language specific to the promissory notes and that the prospects for notes were presented in very optimistic terms and stated financial projections at aggressive multiples without sources or support for such representations. FINRA found these representations to violate its communications rules.

Merrill Lynch Terminates Broker Patrick Sands on Selling Away Allegations

February 29, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The securities fraud lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating the employment separation filed with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) against broker Patrick Sands (Sands). According to BrokerCheck records Sands has been the subject of at least one customer complaint and one employment termination for cause.

In November 2015, Sands’ then brokerage firm Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch) terminated Sands for cause alleging that the broker engaged in conduct inconsistent with the firm’s selling away policies. Participated in private securities transactions without approval of the firm is a practice known as “selling away” in the industry. The allegations appear to involve investments in private placements or direct participation programs such as non-traded real estate investment trusts (Non-Traded REITs), oil and gas programs, or equipment leasing.

In the industry the term selling away refers to when a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or other securities that are not pre-approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. However, even though when these incidents occur the brokerage firm claims ignorance of their advisor’s activities the firm is obligated under the FINRA rules to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from offering investments in this fashion. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to have procedures in order to monitor the activities of each advisor’s activities and interaction with the public. Selling away misconduct often occurs where brokerage firms either fail to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fail to actually implement that system. Supervisory failures allow brokers to engage in unsupervised misconduct that can include all manner improper conduct including selling away.

John Randall “JR” Gladden Accused of Selling Church Fund Loans Away from Brokerage Firm

February 22, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The investment attorneys of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating a regulatory complaint filed (Disciplinary Proceedings No. 2014038996201) by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s (FINRA) against broker J. Randall Gladden (Gladden). FINRA alleged in the complaint that Gladden was associated with Securities Equity Group and participated in creating Church Development Fund, LLC (Church Development Fund) and a successor fund, Church Fund LLC (Church Fund) for the purposes of making loans to churches for refinancing their existing real estate loans. According to FINRA, Gladden participated in the management of the Church Development Fund and Church Fund and served as a governing member of the funds’ respective managers, CDF Managing Partners, LLC (CDF Managing Partners) and CF Manager, LLC (CF Manager).

According to the complaint, from May 2011 through September 2013, Gladden solicited seven investors to invest more than $2.1 million in the funds. The fund represented that it would pay investors a 6% per annum “Priority Return” on their investment. CDF Managing Partners was also to receive a monthly “Operator Fee” based upon a percentage of the outstanding principal amount of the loan portfolio of the Fund and a “Loan Fee” based upon a percentage of the original principal amount of each loan.

The conduct allegedly engaged in by Gladden is also referred to as “selling away” in the industry. In the industry the term selling away refers to when a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or other securities that are not pre-approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. However, even though when these incidents occur the brokerage firm claims ignorance of their advisor’s activities the firm is obligated under the FINRA rules to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from offering investments in this fashion. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to have procedures in order to monitor the activities of each advisor’s activities and interaction with the public. Selling away misconduct often occurs where brokerage firms either fail to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fail to actually implement that system. Supervisory failures allow brokers to engage in unsupervised misconduct that can include all manner improper conduct including selling away.

Advisor Kevin Wanner Accused of Selling Fraudulent Securities

February 15, 2016 | by Staff Attorney

The investment fraud lawyers of Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating regulatory complaints and the termination by Questar Capital Corporation (Questar) of broker Kevin Wanner (Wanner). Questar discharged Wanner alleging that The North Dakota Securities Department (NDSD) issued a cease and desist alleging that Wanner sold time certificate of deposit securities purporting to represent an investment in an FDIC insured interest bearing account and further misrepresented to the investors that their funds would be deposited with the FDIC member financial institutions represented. Instead, the funds were deposited into accounts owned and controlled by Wanner for his own purpose. Thereafter, on December 31, 2015, the NDSD revoked Wanner’s securities license in the state. On January 11, 2016, FINRA permanently barred Wanner form the securities industry.

According to new sources, Wanner and Precision Financial Services were barred from engaging in the business of insurance and from withdrawing any moneys from any banking or financial accounts. The order alleges that two people were given fraudulent certificates of deposit which cannot be authenticated by the banks listed on the documents.

The conduct allegedly engaged in by Wanner is also referred to as “selling away” in the industry. In the industry the term selling away refers to when a financial advisor solicits investments in companies, promissory notes, or other securities that are not pre-approved by the broker’s affiliated firm. However, even though when these incidents occur the brokerage firm claims ignorance of their advisor’s activities the firm is obligated under the FINRA rules to properly monitor and supervise its employees in order to detect and prevent brokers from offering investments in this fashion. In order to properly supervise their brokers each firm is required to have procedures in order to monitor the activities of each advisor’s activities and interaction with the public. Selling away misconduct often occurs where brokerage firms either fail to put in place a reasonable supervisory system or fail to actually implement that system. Supervisory failures allow brokers to engage in unsupervised misconduct that can include all manner improper conduct including selling away.