Failure to Supervise

Gana LLP Files Complaint on Behalf of Former NFL Player

March 26, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP recently filed a complaint with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) on behalf of a former NFL athlete alleging that the brokerage firm Resource Horizons Group LLC (Resource Horizons) failed to supervise Robert Gist (Gist), one of the firm’s associated persons.

The claimant came to know Gist in the 1980s while playing in the NFL. The claimant knew that his NFL earnings would provide him with enough money to save for his retirement and support his lifestyle after retiring from the NFL and wanted Mr. Gist to prudently manage the funds. The claimant trusted Gist through many years of friendship and Gist was invited to the claimant’s family events and functions.

In 1991, Gist solicited the claimant to continue to invest with him at his new firm, Gist, Kennedy & Associates, Inc, (Gist, Kennedy) which also operated as a law firm. According to the complaint, Gist told the claimant that he could invest the couple’s retirement assets and an educational trust the claimant established for the benefit of their children and produce an income of between 7 to 10%.

JP Turner Supervisor Sanctioned Over Failure to Supervise Mutual Fund Switches

March 13, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

As we have reported, claims of churning, excessive trading, and failure to supervise have plagued J.P. Turner & Company, L.L.C. (JP Turner) brokers, among other misconduct. Recently, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) imposed sanctions against Herman Mannings (Mannings), a JP Turner supervisor, concerning allegations that from February 2009, through October 2011, Mannings failed to reasonably supervise the activities of a registered representative to prevent unsuitable mutual fund switching.

On August 20, 2002, Mannings became registered with JP Turner. On February 10, 2003, Mannings was registered as a General Securities Principal at JP Turner. FINRA’s supervisory rule provides that each brokerage firm must establish, maintain, and enforce written procedures to supervise the types of business it engages in. Supervision of registered representatives, registered principals, and other associated persons must be reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations.

FINRA found that from February 2009, through October 2011, Mannings was an Area Vice President for JP Turner and his responsibilities included the supervision of at least 30 branch offices and as many as 60 representatives. According to FINRA, a registered representative referred to as only by the initials “LG” was one of the representatives that Mannings supervised. FINRA found that LG effected approximately 335 unsuitable mutual fund switches in the accounts of 54 customers without having reasonable grounds for believing that such transactions were suitable for those customers.

Center Street Securities Fined by FINRA Over Email Supervisory Failures

February 28, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned broker Center Street Securities, Inc. (Center Street) concerning allegations that the firm failed to establish, maintain, and enforce adequate supervisory systems and written supervisory procedures to monitor the use of external email accounts to conduct firm-related business by the firm’s registered representatives. The firm was fined $30,000.

Center Street has been a FlNRA member since February 7, 1991 and employs approximately 84 registered persons out of 74 branch offices. Center Street’s principal office is in Nashville, Tennessee. Center Street sells variable life insurance and annuities, mutual funds, private placements, options, corporate equities, debt securities, U.S. government securities and municipal securities.

The duty to supervise is a critical component of the securities regulatory scheme. The duty to supervise is an affirmative responsibility of all brokerage firms. The SEC has found that effective supervision by a broker-dealer must provide effective staffing, efficient resources and a system of follow-up and review to determine that any responsibility to supervise is being diligently exercised. Evidence that there is a variance between the conduct called for by a firm’s procedures and the actions actually undertaken by a firm supports a finding of liability and failure to supervise.

FINRA Alleges that Cambridge Investment Research Failed to Supervise Broker Emails

February 20, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) sanctioned brokerage firm Cambridge Investment Research, Inc. concerning allegations that from January 2009, to July 2010, Cambridge failed to ensure that the firm preserved, maintained, and reviewed the business emails of two of its registered representatives. FINRA found that during this time Cambridge was relying upon its representatives to forward copies of their emails but did not have effective procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the representatives actually forwarded emails in violation of FINRA supervision rules.

Cambridge has been a FINRA member since December 1995 and has 3,044 registered individuals in 1,530 branch offices.

The duty to supervise has been held to be a critical component of the securities regulatory scheme. Supervisors have an obligation to employ systems and processes designed to ferret out wrongful behavior. In addition, firms must respond vigorously to indications of irregularity, commonly referred to as “red flags” of misconduct.

FINRA fines Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH) $8 Million for Substantial Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Failures

February 13, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

FINRA fines Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH) $8 Million for substantial anti-money laundering compliance failures and suspended the firm’s global anti-money laundering compliance officer, Harold Crawford, for 30 days. The New York-based investment firm did not have an adequate program in place to look for and detect suspicious penny stock transactions, according the Financial Industrial Regulatory Authority (FINRA). The firm also failed to investigate suspicious activity involving penny stocks after becoming aware of the problem. The transaction in question generated at least $850 million in proceeds for Brown Brothers customers from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2013.

Low-priced securities, such as penny stocks pose heightened risks because they may be manipulated by fraudsters. BBH executed transactions and delivered securities involving at least six billion shares of penny stocks, according to FINRA. BBH executed these transactions despite the fact that it was unable to obtain essential information to verify that the stocks were free trading. According to FINRA, in many instances, BBH lacked such basic information, such as the identity of the stock’s true owner. The absence of these details should trigger a review of the transactions by a firm’s anti-money laundering team.

Brad Bennett, FINRA Executive Vice President, Enforcement, said: “The sanction in this case reflects the gravity of Brown Brothers Harriman’s compliance failure. The firm opened its doors to undisclosed sellers of penny stocks from secrecy havens without regard of who was behind those transactions, or whether the stock was properly registered or exempt from registration. This case is a reminder to firms of what can happen if they choose to engage in the penny stock liquidation business when they lack the ability to manage the risks involved.”

FINRA Sanctions Bedminster Financial Group Concerning Allegations of Supervisory Failures

January 20, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently sanctioned Bedminster Financial Group, Ltd. (BFG) and Robert M. Van Pelt (Van Pelt). FINRA alleged that at least four representatives of BFG used non-BFG email accounts for securities related communications to the public, customers and prospective customers and that Van Pelt failed to retain and review these emails. FINRA also found that BFG, through its President and Chief Compliance Officer Van Pelt, failed to enforce its written supervisory procedures by failing to 1) preserve business related emails; 2) review of business related mail; 3) inspect of non-branch offices; and 4) review and approve website content.

BFG’s main office is located in Holicong, Pennsylvania. BFG employs thirty-four registered persons, had six registered branch offices, and twenty-eight non-branch offices located across the country. BFG’s primary business is the receipt of finder’s fees for private placements and Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE) offerings. Since 1996, Van Pelt has been registered with BFG and is the firm’s President, CCO, and majority owner.

The securities laws require firms to maintain and preserve for at least three years originals of all communications received and copies of all communications sent relating to the firm’s business. BFG’s supervisory procedures required representatives to use the firm’s email account for business related communications and prohibited employees from communicating with customers or prospects through their personal email accounts unless the outside account was first approved by the firm and records of the email activity were provided to the firm. Despite BFG’s prohibition against using personal email addresses, FINRA found that at least four representatives used their unapproved personal email accounts for business-related communications without copying or forwarding these emails to the firm.

Securities Broker Christopher Orlando Suspended Over Sale of Diversified Lending Group Promissory Notes

January 8, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Broker Christopher Orlando (Orlando) was suspended and fined by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over allegations that Orlando participated in the sale of approximately $7,000,000 in private securities transactions of promissory notes linked to Diversified Lending Group (DLG) that were not made through his member firm PlanMember Securities Corporation (PlanMember).

FINRA alleged that between March 2007, and July 2008 Orlando marketed Secured Investment Notes in DLG (DLG Notes). According to Orlando’s public disclosures, the DLG notes were supposed to invest funds in distressed real estate and mortgage lending. Investors who filed complaints against Orlando and the brokerage firms that employed him have alleged that in reality the DLG Notes were Ponzi scheme type fraud.

Orlando marketed the DLG Notes to insurance agents and financial advisors who in tum sold the DLG Notes to investors. FINRA alleged that Orlando met with his marketing agents and provided them with information and materials about DLG Notes. In addition, Orlando referred at least eight insurance agents to DLG for training so that they would sell DLG Notes to investors. According to FINRA, Orlando was also directly involved in marketing the DLG Notes to potential investors by speaking at seminars about them.

Saxony Securities Fined by Securities Regulator Over Sale of Nontraditional ETFs

January 3, 2014 | by Staff Attorney

Broker-dealer Saxony Securities, Inc. (“Saxony”) was recently fined $15,000 over allegations by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the regulator of securities broker-dealers, that Saxony failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system, including written procedures, regarding the sale of leveraged or inverse exchange-traded ETFs that was reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the FINRA rules.

Saxony has been registered with FINRA since 2002. Saxony has its main offices in St. Louis, Missouri and employs approximately 100 registered representatives at the firm’s 50 branch offices.

Nontraditional ETFs are designed to return a multiple of some underlying index or benchmark such as the Dow Jones, S&P 500, or other targeted index. Some nontraditional ETFs return the inverse of that benchmark or index. These nontraditional ETFs are supposed to be held only for a one trading session – usually a single day. As a result, the performance of nontraditional ETFs over periods of time longer than a single trading session can be significantly different from the performance of their underlying index or benchmark. Accordingly, Nontraditional ETFs are inherently risky and complex products. FINRA has advised brokerage firms that nontraditional ETFs are typically not suitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading session, particularly in volatile markets.

David Kauffman of First Allied Barred Over Allegations of Sale of Private Placements

December 20, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Broker David Charles Kauffman (Kauffman) was recently barred by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over his failure to respond to FINRA’s investigation over allegations that he engaged in personal private securities transactions, used unapproved email addresses, and introduced clients to individuals associated with non-approved investment opportunities.

Kauffman began his career in the securities industry in 1993 and has been registered with 13 FINRA member firms. From March 2006 through September 2010, Kauffman was registered with FINRA as a General Securities Principal and a General Securities Representative at First Allied Securities, Inc. (First Allied). First Allied terminated Kauffman for violating firm policies pertaining to his personal private securities transactions, used unapproved email addresses, and introduced clients to individuals associated with non-approved investment opportunities. Thereafter, Kauffman was registered with MCL Financial Group, Inc. through December 2011. Kauffman’s BrokerCheck discloses that Kauffman was also employed by David Kauffman Insurance Services, One-Less Putt, MCS Golf, 928 LLC, and EDT Property Services.

In September 2010, First Allied made two filings with FINRA disclosing it had terminated Kauffman for conduct including engagement in private securities transactions in connection with several private placement offerings without providing written notice to the firm. FINRA alleged that one of the offerings Kauffman was involved in was entity named Gulf Coast Oil & Rig, LLC (Gulf Coast). Thereafter, FINRA staff sought information, documents, and testimony from Kauffman to determine, among other things, his role and compensation in connection with the private securities transactions, as well as the status of Gulf Coast’s business. Initially, Kauffman cooperated with the examination by providing some information and documents. However, FINRA alleged that Kauffman failed to respond properly to further requests.

Broker Joseph Giordano of Capital Investment Group Sanctioned Over Empire Debenture Sales

December 19, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

Broker Joseph Anthony Giordano (Giordano) was recently barred from the financial industry by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) over allegations that he participated in the distribution of unregistered debentures issued by Empire Corporation, a Maryland corporation (Empire Debentures) to customers of Capital Investment Group, Inc. (CIG). FINRA alleged that Giordano violated FINRA Rules by soliciting the sales of the Empire Debentures. In addition, FINRA found Giordano’s Empire Debentures sales to customers were without a reasonable basis for making such recommendation. Finally, FINRA found that Giordano engaged in securities fraud by making intentionally false and misleading statements in connection with the sales of the Empire Debentures to customers.

Giordano was registered with Capital Investment Group from September 1992 until his termination on June 20, 2012. Giordano’s U5 states that he was terminated for “selling away” and making false and misleading statements to the firm. On July 2, 2012, Giordano became registered with Meyers Associates, L.P. (Meyers) until his registration was terminated by Meyers on July 10, 2013. Giordano’s BrokerCheck states that he is the general manager of Giordano Asset Management LLC and treasurer of Giordano Holding Corporation.

FINRA found that Giordano sold approximately $3.1 million of the Empire Debentures to at least 45 customers of CIG. The Empire Debentures had varying maturities but the majority had a five-year maturity and promised interest at an annual compounded rate of ten percent paid at maturity. FINRA alleged that the Empire Debentures were speculative investments considering their high-yield, lack of credit analyses or an effective registration statement, and the complete absence of a secondary market. The sale of the Empire Debentures was in contravention of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 requiring the registration of securities. The securities were also not registered with the State of Maryland. In addition, FINRA alleged that Giordano failed to conduct adequate due diligence regarding the registration status of the Empire Debentures prior to recommending and selling the debentures to customers.