According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Megurditch Patatian (Patatian), previously associated with Supreme Alliance LLC, has at least 11 disclosable events. These events include 11 customer complaints, alleging that Patatian recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on November 15, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable and misleading. Investments purchased from 2013 to 2014.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on November 04, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable and misleading. Investments purchased from 2013 to 2014.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on October 07, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on September 13, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable and misleading.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on September 09, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on September 06, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on September 06, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $5,000.00 on September 04, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendations were unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $1,000,000.00 on August 29, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $75,000.00 on August 29, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $200,000.00 on August 27, 2024.
Customer alleges that an investment recommendation was unsuitable.
Under the securities laws brokers are obligated to act in their clients’ best interests and provide only suitable recommendations for investments to the client. In addition, the SEC has promulgated ‘Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI)‘ which according to the SEC enhanced the broker-dealer standard of conduct beyond existing suitability obligations and requires broker-dealers to act in the best interest of a retail customer when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities. Regulation Best Interest and the fiduciary standard for investment advisers are drawn from key fiduciary principles that include an obligation to act in the retail investor’s best interest and not to place their own interests ahead of the investor’s interest.
Brokers have an obligation to first obtain and evaluate sufficient information about a retail investor to form a reasonable basis to believe the account recommendations are in the retail investor’s best interest. Recommendations cannot be based on materially inaccurate or incomplete information. The cost of the recommendation and information about the investor are always part of material information. Types of costs that must be considered including account fees, commissions and transaction costs, tax considerations, as well as indirect costs.
In addition to obligation to understand the customer the broker must also investigate the product being sold. FINRA firms have an obligation to conduct a reasonable investigation of the issuer and the securities they recommend in offerings. A brokerage firm has a special relationship with a customer from the fact that in recommending the security, the broker represents to the customer that a reasonable investigation has been made. So, a brokerage firm should not depend solely on the issuer for data about a company instead of performing its own thorough review.
Another protective measure for investors is the requirement for brokers to disclose. Brokers are required to report events to FINRA, such as customer complaints, IRS tax liens, judgments, investigations, terminations, and even criminal matters, as shown on their BrokerCheck reports. FINRA has recognized that recent studies offer evidence showing that brokers with a past history of regulatory and customer complaint issues are more likely to have such issues in the future. FINRA’s Office of the Chief Economist (OCE) published a study showing the predictability of disciplinary and disclosure events based on past similar events. The OCE study showed that past disclosure events, including regulatory actions, customer arbitrations and litigations of brokers, have significant power to predict future investor harm. The data shows that where a member firm on-boards brokers with a significant history of misconduct there is a high likelihood that the broker will continue to engage in similar behavior.
Patatian has been in the securities industry for more than 21 years. Patatian has been registered as a Broker with Supreme Alliance LLC since 2020.
Investors who have suffered losses are encouraged to contact us at (800) 810-4262 for consultation. At Gana Weinstein LLP, our attorneys are experienced representing investors who have suffered securities losses due to the mishandling of their accounts. Claims may be brought in securities arbitration before FINRA. Our consultations are free of charge and the firm is only compensated if you recover.