Articles Tagged with SPARTAN CAPITAL SECURITIES

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Robert Rotunno (Rotunno), currently associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include 2 customer complaints, alleging that Rotunno recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $251,250.00  on January 31, 2025.

Customer alleges 1 unsuitable product sold at Tigress Financial Partners in 2019. The other allegations occurred at different Firms not named in the Arbitration  The Arbitration also names National Securities Corporation.

According to BrokerCheck records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) broker Jordan Meadow (Meadow), previously associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has been subject to at least one disclosable event. These events include one tax lien. Several of those complaints against Meadow  concern allegations of high frequency trading activity also referred to as churning or excessive trading among other securities laws violations.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on March 10, 2025.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Meadow consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA in connection with an investigation into potential excessive trading at his member firm.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Richard Perlongo (Perlongo), currently associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one tax lien, alleging that Perlongo recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on March 06, 2025.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Perlongo consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he excessively and unsuitably traded a customer’s account. The findings stated that the customer relied on Perlongo’s advice and routinely followed his recommendations and, as a result, Perlongo exercised de facto control over the account. Perlongo recommended frequent in-and-out trading even when the price of his recommended securities did not materially change. As a result of Perlongo’s recommendations, the customer paid $18,925 in commissions and suffered $70,107 in realized losses.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker David Page (Page), previously associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 3 disclosable events. These events include 2 customer complaints, one tax lien, alleging that Page recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on September 09, 2024.

Respondent Page failed to comply with an arbitration award or settlement agreement or to satisfactorily respond to a FINRA request to provide information concerning the status of compliance.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Kostas Tsamos (Tsamos), previously associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include 2 regulatory, alleging that Tsamos recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on October 08, 2024.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Tsamos consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he willfully violated the Best Interest Obligation under Rule 15l-1(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Reg BI) by recommending a series of trades in customers’ accounts, four of whom were senior customers, that was excessive, unsuitable, and not in the customers’ best interests. The findings stated that Tsamos’ customers relied on his advice and routinely followed his recommendations and, as a result, he exercised de facto control over the customers’ accounts. Tsamos’s trading in the customer accounts resulted in total trading costs of $958,948, including $849,576 in commissions, and caused over $1.03 million in total realized losses.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker John Lowry (Lowry), currently associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 3 disclosable events. These events include 2 customer complaints, one regulatory, alleging that Lowry recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint on November 08, 2024.

Lowry was named a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that while acting as his member firm’s CEO, he failed to timely provide information and documents requested by FINRA pursuant to FINRA Rule 8210 until after FINRA issued two follow-up requests and initiated two expedited proceedings to compel compliance. The complaint alleges that the firm’s Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) failed to timely respond to five requests made pursuant to Rule 8210 until after FINRA issued six follow-up requests and initiated five expedited proceedings to compel compliance. FINRA initially began investigating the firm’s sales of membership interests in unregistered private funds, an OBA of Lowry and the CAO. FINRA’s requests sought information and documents about the private funds and later sought information and documents relating to the firm’s net capital calculations. FINRA was required to exert a significant amount of regulatory pressure to obtain the information and documents that were important to its ongoing investigation into the firm’s and its registered representatives’ dealings with the private funds. The complaint also alleges that Lowry failed to maintain a reasonable system for the firm’s compliance with Rule 8210 and failed to supervise the CAO’s responses to Rule 8210 requests. After delegating his responsibility for supervising the firm’s compliance with Rule 8210 and his responsibility for some of FINRA’s requests to the CAO, Lowry did not review his delegations of authority to ensure that they were being properly exercised. Lowry failed to intervene and take corrective measures as necessary after learning of red flags suggesting that the CAO was not carrying out her delegated authorities.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Kim Monchik (Monchik), currently associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include one customer complaint, one regulatory, alleging that Monchik recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint on November 08, 2024.

Monchik was named a respondent in a FINRA complaint alleging that, while acting as her member firm’s Chief Administrative Officer (CAO), she failed to timely respond to five requests made pursuant to Rule 8210 until after FINRA issued six follow-up requests and initiated five expedited proceedings to compel compliance. The complaint alleges that FINRA initially began investigating the firm’s sales of membership interests in unregistered private funds, an OBA of Monchik and the firm’s CEO. FINRA’s requests sought information and documents about the private funds and later sought information and documents relating to the firm’s net capital calculations. FINRA was required to exert a significant amount of regulatory pressure to obtain the information and documents that were important to its ongoing investigation into the firm’s and its registered representatives’ dealings with the private funds.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Ahmad Maklouf (Maklouf), previously associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include one customer complaint, one refulatory, alleging that Maklouf recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on November 19, 2024.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Maklouf consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to produce information and documents requested by FINRA in connection with an investigation into his OBAs, including his potential involvement in an outside investment vehicle, while associated with his member firm.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Kyle Manning (Manning), previously associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include 2 regulatory, alleging that Manning recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on January 06, 2025.

Respondent Manning failed to comply with an arbitration award or settlement agreement or to satisfactorily respond to a FINRA request to provide information concerning the status of compliance.

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker James Pecoraro (Pecoraro), currently associated with Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one customer complaint, alleging that Pecoraro recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $500,000.00 on January 02, 2025.

Negligence, Misrepresentation, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Deception, Exploitation, Negligent Supervisor

Contact Information