Securities Lawyers Blog
According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker William Weisbrod (Weisbrod), previously associated with Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments, has at least 2 disclosable events. These events include one customer complaint, one regulatory event, alleging that Weisbrod recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.
FINRA BrokerCheck shows a final customer complaint on August 02, 2023.
Without admitting or denying the findings, Weisbrod consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he breached fiduciary duties owed to a community bank for which he served as an advisory director and consultant. The findings stated that the bank was a customer of Weisbrod’s member firm and relied upon his investment knowledge and experience to determine its investment strategy. Weisbrod breached his fiduciary duties to the bank by directing it to engage in an investment strategy that generated revenue for Weisbrod but exposed the bank to excessive risk and unnecessary trading costs. At Weisbrod’s recommendation, the bank opened brokerage accounts at the firm with a registered representative who worked in the same office as Weisbrod. Although Weisbrod represented to the firm that he would not be involved with the bank’s investments through it, Weisbrod directed the trading in the bank’s accounts. Weisbrod recommended that the bank engage in a risky trading strategy involving fixed-income securities purchased through the firm. Weisbrod’s trading generated over $1 million in commissions for the registered representative assigned to the bank’s accounts, who directed more than $370,000 of these commissions to Weisbrod, through a series of payments that Weisbrod did not disclose to the bank. Weisbrod recommended that the bank trade through the firm even though it lacked a fixed-income trading desk. Because the firm lacked a fixed-income trading desk, it had to use a third-party ‘broker’s broker’ to acquire fixed-income securities for the bank, which caused the bank to pay approximately $1.25 million in additional markups to the broker’s broker. Weisbrod did not disclose these markups to the bank. As a result of Weisbrod’s trading strategy, the bank spent more than $600,000 to remediate the risk of its investment portfolio. The findings also stated that Weisbrod falsely represented to the firm that he was not involved with the bank’s investments through it in connection with the firm’s inquiry into his OBA involving the bank.