promissory notes

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) recently entered a default decision against George Alexander Kardaras (Kardaras) and Brian Matt Borakowski (Borakowski) after having alleged that the two brokers perpetrated a Ponzi scheme. FINRA found that the two solicited at least 12 customers over four years to invest more than $665,000 in total in Echo Canyon promissory notes. The notes bore interest rates between 14 to 56 percent and had quarterly, semiannual, and annual maturity dates.

Kardas’ and Borakowski’s scheme involved soliciting customers to purchase promissory notes in Echo Canyon LLC, a limited liability company in Arizona. Kardas and Borakowski told investors that their investment would be used to purchase used vehicles in U.S. auto auctions and shipped to Russia for re-sale. FINRA determined that Kardaras and Borakowski never intended to use the customer funds as represented. Instead, only two automobiles for EchoCanyon in or around late 2007 or early 2008 were actually purchased.

FINRA found that 95 percent of the funds raised, approximately $634,000 were used by the two brokers in order to pay personal expenses, to cover expenses at their employer firms’ branch office businesses, and to make payments to earlier investors in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has filed a complaint against Success Trade Securities, Inc (STS) and its CEO and President Fuad Ahmed (Ahmed) accusing them of improperly selling $18 million worth promissory notes. The promissory notes were issued by STS’ parent company Success Trade, Inc. (STI) to 58 investors. The notes were sold primarily to sports athletes in the NFL or NBA.

The FINRA complaint alleges that the STI notes were part of ponzi scheme to simply raise capital and fund STS’ operations while purportedly offering investors 12-26% returns. The investors were not aware of the risks of investing in the STI notes. For example, STS was at all times financially insolvent and could only meet its ongoing expenses by selling more STI notes and by continuing the scheme. Crucial risks such as the viability of the company are material risks that need to be disclosed to investors. The complaint also alleges that STS and Ahmed failed to register the STI notes as a private placement offering as required under Regulation D.

Problems with the notes began to emerge once the STI notes became due in 2012 through 2013. At that time, STS and Ahmed solicited noteholders to roll over or extend the terms of the STI notes at higher interest rates or offered customers an equity interest in STS. The complaint also alleges that in connection with the rollover and extended note sales the firm failed to disclose to some investors that the firm is financially unable to repay the notes that have become due.

Articles Tagged with promissory notes

FINRA Finds George Kardaras and Brian Borakowski Sell Echo Canyon, LLC Away From Their Brokerage Firms

Gana LLP Investigating Claims Against Success Trade Securities for Sale of Promissory Notes