Articles Tagged with Pershing LLC

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial Broker Regina Loeks (Loeks), currently associated with Pershing LLC / Pershing Advisor Solutions LLC, has at least one disclosable event. These events include one customer complaint, alleging that Loeks recommended unsuitable investments in different investment products including debt securities among other allegations and complaints.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint with a damage request of $51,271.00 on June 13, 2024.

Customer alleges that on a call with Regina Loeks, Client Processing Associate, on May 7, 2024, they requested that their position in White River Energy Corp (“WTRV”) and White River Energy Corp warrants (“WTRVW”) be liquidated and transferred to their new custodian. The WRTV warrants required exercising prior to liquidation but Ms. Loeks submitted a request incorrectly to liquidate the warrants instead of exercising. The WRTV shares were not sold as they were not in the account at the time of request.

Over the last several years, we have seen the collapse of frauds and the capture of fraudsters, who have perpetuated a mind-numbing blow to the market and its participants. When we talk about Ponzi Schemes, the first name that springs to mind is, of course, Bernard Madoff. However, two years later authorities honed in on R. Allen Stanford (Stanford) and his fraudulent empire, which may have more far-reaching consequences than people think.

While the ponzi scheme developed and operated by Stanford fleeced investors of  “only” eight billion dollars, it was perhaps far more damaging than the Madoff scheme. Why? Because the Stanford case pertains to everybody—not just to Stanford investors, not just the government, and not just the upper echelon of wealthy individuals. The Stanford scheme exploited one of the oldest, safest, and most universally understood financial instruments on the market—the Certificate of Deposit (CDs).

The ultimate reality of the Stanford Financial Group was that it was a Ponzi scheme. Essentially, Stanford and his co-conspirators used the Stanford Financial Group and the promise of high-return CD’s to lure investor money into different Stanford companies, where the funds were then pooled together and used for undisclosed and impermissible purposes. Federal authorities ultimately discovered Stanford’s multi-billion dollar scheme, putting an end to Stanford Financial Group and charging Stanford, civilly and criminally, with multiple counts of fraud. In March 2012, Stanford was convicted on 13 of 14 counts by a federal jury following a six-week trial and approximately three days of deliberation. It was ultimately revealed that the Stanford Financial Group was “selling” CD’s, marketed as low-risk, high return investments, but in reality, were paying distributions with subsequent investments–the prototypical pyramid scheme.

Contact Information