Securities Lawyers Blog

James Couture Accused of Misappropriating Client Funds – Investor Recovery

September 13, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims that advisor James Couture (Couture) has converted customer funds among other allegations. According to BrokerCheck records, Schmidt is formerly registered with The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) member firm LPL Financial LLC (LPL Financial) out of the firm’s Worcester, Massachusetts office location. In addition, Couture disclosed two customer complaints, one employment terminations for cause, and two regulatory actions. If you have been a victim of Couture’s alleged misconduct our firm may be able to assist you in recovering funds.

In June 2020 LPL Financial terminated Couture alleging that he had altered identifying information, account balances and distributions in customer account statement, maintained comingled customer funds, use of an unapproved email address. Thereafter, FINRA investigated these claims but Couture refused to comply with the agency’s requests.

In June 2021 the SEC alleged that Couture violated his fiduciary duty to his clients by engaging in a deceptive scheme to misappropriate approximately $2.9 million from them. According to the SEC, Couture fraudulently prompted his clients to sell portions of their securities holdings in order to fund large money transfers to an entity that he owned and controlled. The SEC alleges that once Couture used the fraudulently obtained authorizations to secure the sale of client securities and transfers of the proceeds to his exclusive control, Couture then spnt the money for his own benefit. Couture went so far as to lull clients into believing that their sale proceeds had been actually reinvested by providing them with fabricated account systems and account holding reviews. The SEC found that the fabricated statements contained securities transactions that never happened, investments that did not exist, and earnings that the clients never received for the purposes of creating the false appearance that Couture had reinvested his clients’ money.

Michael Lackwood, Spring Delta Advisor, Accused of Unsuitable Investments

September 13, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating BrokerCheck records reports that Advisor Michael Lackwood (Lackwood), currently employed by Spring Delta Asset Management, LLC (Spring Delta) has been subject to at least one customer complaint and one employment termination for cause during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Lackwood’s customer complaint alleges that Lackwood recommended unsuitable investments in various investments including allegations involving risky and speculative securities, among other allegations of misconduct relating to the handling of their accounts.

In May 2019, a customer complained that Lackwood violated the securities laws by alleging that Lackwood did not follow the customer’s instructions to sell. The complaint further alleged that Lackwood engaged in unsuitable investment advice, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. Lastly, the complaint alleged that Lackwood engaged in misrepresentations related to risky and speculative securities. The claim settled in the amount of $115,000.

Brokers are required under the securities laws to treat their clients fairly. This obligation includes the duties to disclose material risks of the investments they recommend and to present products, particularly complex or confusing products, in a fair and balanced manner that allows the client to evaluate the recommendation. Another important obligation advisors have is to make only suitable recommendations for investments to the client. There are many investments that are not appropriate for the majority of investors or for certain investors given their risk tolerance, age, and other factors. Advisors should not present these investment options to clients. There are two screens that advisors must employ to determine whether an investment is suitable for a client. First, there must be a reasonable basis for the recommendation – meaning that the product has been investigated and due diligence conducted into the investment’s features, benefits, risks, and other relevant factors. The advisor must conclude that the investment is suitable for at least some investors and some securities may be suitable for no one. Second, the broker then must match the investment as being appropriate for the customer’s specific investment needs and objectives such as the client’s retirement status, long or short term goals, age, disability, income needs, or any other relevant factor.

Advisor John Howard Has Unsuitable Investment Complaints

September 12, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating BrokerCheck records reports that advisor John Howard (Howard), currently employed by Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (Raymond James) has been subject to at least three customer complaints during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Howard’s customer complaints alleges that Howard recommended unsuitable investments in various investments including allegations involving unauthorized trading among other allegations of misconduct relating to the handling of their accounts.

In September 2019, a customer complained that Howard violated the securities laws by alleging that Howard engaged in breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, breach of contract, and violated several other securities laws. The claim settled in the amount of $97,500.

In March 2008, a customer complained that Howard violated the securities laws by alleging that Howard engaged in unauthorized purchase of commercial paper. The claim settled in the amount of $1,134,601.00.

In February 2005, a customer complained that Howard violated the securities laws by alleging that Howard conducted unauthorized trades. The claim alleges settled in the amount of $7,859.83.

Advisor Michael Shillin Accused of Numerous Allegations of Financial Misconduct and Fraud – Investor Recovery Options

September 12, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims that advisor Michael Shillin (Shillin) has been accused by numerous clients of engaging in fraudulent investment activities including undisclosed outside business activities (OBAs) and private securities transactions. According to records kept by FINRA Shillin was employed by Alliance Global Partners at the time of the activity. If you have been a victim of Shillin’s alleged misconduct our firm may be able to assist you in recovering funds.

As reported by WEAU News, Shillin has been barred from working in the brokerage industry. FINRA has disclosed that Shillin refused to respond to the claims and complaints made against him. “In one of two new complaints, one count alleges that Shillin claimed to have purchased 20-thousand dollars in Space-X shares, but withdrew 25-thousand from their account. Another client writes that Shillin falsified documents to cover up a non-existent life insurance policy. This person wrote a check for nearly 30-thousand dollars for the policy.”

One of dozens of complaints filed relating to Shillin states “Each claimant alleges one or more of the following: that former FA misrepresented that he bought securities in claimants’ accounts when he did not actually buy them and presented claimants with documents that led them to believe the securities had been bought; represented that a claimant could obtain long-term care benefits under a rider to the claimant-spouse’s long-term care policy but never submitted the paperwork; failed to inform claimants that there were limits on penalty-free withdrawals from 401k accounts that had been rolled into an IRA; incorrectly represented to claimants they could withdraw from their IRAs when the withdrawals were prohibited transactions, and he prepared falsified accounting documents; improperly advised claimants they were eligible for a benefit under the Affordable Care Act and prepared a falsified Form 1099 reflecting a lower income; incorrectly advised claimants that investments in pre-IPO stocks would provide certain tax benefits, provided figures to include in tax returns, and represented that he would file the tax returns and forward payment to the IRS for claimants but failed to do so; incorrectly advised claimants on how much they could withdraw from their accounts to live on; and/or incorrectly advised claimants they could retire based on the purported performance of their portfolios.”

Merrill Lynch Financial Advisor Mark Jones Has Nine Investor Complaints

September 11, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating BrokerCheck records reports that Financial Advisor Mark Jones (Jones), currently employed by Merrill Lynch, has been subject to at least nine customer complaints during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Jones’ customer complaints alleges that Jones recommended unsuitable investments in various investments, among other allegations of misconduct relating to the handling of their accounts.

In May 2019, a customer complained that Jones violated the securities laws by alleging that Jones engaged in material misrepresentations. The claim settled in the amount of $70,026.

In February 2014, a customer complained that Jones violated the securities laws by alleging that Jones engaged in unsuitable investment advice, and material misrepresentations. The claim settled in the amount of $26,250.

In April 2002, a customer complained that Jones violated the securities laws by alleging that Jones engaged in unsuitable investment advice. $400,000 in damages were granted.

Cambridge Financial Advisor Eladio Santiago Has Disputes Over Unsuitable Investment Advice

September 11, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating BrokerCheck records reports that Financial Advisor Eladio Santiago (Santiago), currently employed by Cambridge Investment Research, Inc. (Cambridge), has been subject to at least three customer complaints during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Santiago’s customer complaints alleges that Santiago recommended unsuitable investments in various investments, among other allegations of misconduct relating to the handling of their accounts.

In February 2020, a customer complained that Santiago violated the securities laws by alleging that Santiago engaged in unsuitable investment advice, and mismanagement of accounts. The claim settled in the amount of $75,000.

In August, 2019, a customer complained that Santiago violated the securities laws by alleging that Santiago engaged in unsuitable investment advice, and mismanagement of accounts. The claim settled in the amount of $95,000.

In December, 2002, a customer complained that Santiago violated the securities laws by alleging that Santiago engaged in unsuitable investment transactions in the accounts. The claim alleged $756,000 in damages. The claim was closed without action.

Advisor Dwight Dykstra Sanctioned By Regulator Over Senior Living Real Estate Promissory Note Sales – Investor Recovery Options

June 14, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP are currently investigating claims that advisor Dwight Dykstra (Dykstra) has been accused by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) of engaging in undisclosed outside business activities (OBAs) and private securities transactions. According to records kept by FINRA Dykstra was employed by Vision Brokerage Services, LLC (Vision Brokerage) a the time of the activity and is now registered Alternative Investment Advisors, LLC (Alternative Investment). If you have been a victim of Dykstra’s alleged misconduct our firm may be able to assist you in recovering funds.

According to FINRA, the regulator sanctioned Dykstra after he consented to the sanction that he participated in private securities transactions without providing prior written notice to his member firm. The findings stated that, while registered through with his firm, Dykstra participated in private securities transactions by soliciting investments in promissory notes issued by a company raising capital to develop a senior living real estate project. FINRA found that Dykstra contacted prospective investors to inform them of the investment opportunity, provided marketing materials to interested investors, participated in communications between the issuer and interested investors, and facilitated the sale of approximately $2 million of promissory notes to 21 investors. FINRA also found that Dykstra was paid $67,500 in selling compensation for his participation in the transactions.

SW Financial’s Joseph Gebron Allegedly Violates Securities Laws

June 14, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP are investigating BrokerCheck records reports that broker Joseph Gebron (Gebron) currently employed by SW Financial has been subject to at least seven customer complaints, one employment termination for cause, and one criminal matter during the course of his career. According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Gebron’s customer complaints alleges that Gebron recommended unsuitable investments in various investments. Allegations involving common and preferred stocks, and private placement securities, among other allegations of misconduct relating to the handling of their accounts.

In January 2013, a customer complained that Gebron violated the securities laws by alleging that Gebron engaged in unauthorized trading, misleading representations, and omissions. The claim alleges $820,000 in damages and is currently pending.

In February 2012, a customer complained that Gebron violated the securities laws by alleging that Gebron engaged in negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. The claim settled in the amount of $47,500.

In May 2011, a customer complained that Gebron violated the securities laws by alleging that Gebron engaged in unsuitable investment advice, violation of common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligence. The claim settled in the amount of $45,000.

In November 2009, a customer complained that Gebron violated the securities laws by alleging that Gebron engaged in unsuitable investment advice, negligence, and breach of fiduciary duty. The claim settled in the amount of $50,000.

Ameriprise Financial Advisor Kevin Houser Has REIT Investment Complaints

May 31, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

Advisor Kevin Houser (Houser), currently employed by brokerage firm Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC (Ameriprise) has been subject to at least four customer complaints during the course of his career. According to a BrokerCheck report several of the customer complaints concern alternative investments such as direct participation products (DPPs) like business development companies (BDCs), non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs), oil & gas programs, annuities, and private placements. The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP have represented hundreds of investors who suffered losses caused by these types of high risk, low reward products.

In November 2020 a customer complained that Houser violated the securities laws by alleging that Houser made misleading recommendations in various REITs and BDCs including Franklin Square, Cole Credit Property Trust IV, and CIM REIT. The claim involves alternative investments and alleges $358,000 damages, and is currently pending.

In July 2020 a customer complained that Houser violated the securities laws by alleging that Houser made misleading recommendations in various REITs, BDCs, and an annuity including Franklin Square. The claim involves alternative investments and alleges $300,000 damages, and is currently pending.

Broker Timothy O’Brien Sanctioned By FINRA Over Unauthorized Trade

May 25, 2021 | by Staff Attorney

According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) financial advisor Timothy O’Brien (O’Brien), formerly employed by Feltl & Company has been subject to numerous disclosures including at least six customer complaints, two criminal matters, four judgement or tax liens, and regulatory complaints during the course of his career. O’Brien customer complaints alleges that O’Brien recommended unsuitable investments, made misrepresentations, and overconcentrated investments relating to the handling of client accounts.

In November 2020 O’Brien consented to FINRA findings and sanctions that he placed unauthorized trades in a customer’s account. FINRA found that O’Brien sold a limited partnership position in the customer’s account and purchased Class A shares of a mutual fund. FINRA found that O’Brien then attempted to call the customer to discuss the trades but did not reach her before executing the transactions.

In July 2020 a customer complained that O’Brien violated the securities laws by alleging that O’Brien made unsuitable investments, over concentration, and misrepresentation resulting in excessive losses in the account. The claim alleged $450,000 in damages and settled for $350,000.

O’Brien has several large tax liens. Such disclosures on a broker’s CRD can be a red flag that the broker may be influenced to engage in high commission activity in order to satisfy personal debts. In addition, a broker’s inability to manage their own finances is relevant in a customer’s decision to use their services. Continue Reading