Securities Attorney

Churning Zero Coupon Bond Treasuries

December 11, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigates broker-dealer’s actions, including cases of misrepresentation, market manipulation, theft of customers’ funds, illegal schemes and the sale of unregistered securities. If the broker-dealer violates a securities law, the SEC enforces administrative action and civil penalties. In other circumstances, an investor may file a complaint with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

Recently, a complaint was filed against Robert O. Klein (Klein) and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (J.P. Morgan). The client asserted the following claims, the broker-dealer and the securities firm breached their fiduciary duty, broker-dealer’s investment strategy used unauthorized margin transactions, and the broker-dealer selected investments that were unsuitable for their account. Although Klein denies any misconduct, J.P. Morgan has settled two claims against Klein. In both instances, clients alleged that the investment strategy was unsuitable and overly concentrated in a short Treasury bond positions. Klein responded to these allegations by stating that the losses were the result of a rapid deterioration in market conditions and he employed the appropriate investment strategy.

Although each investor portfolio differs, Klein appears to be facing allegations of employing unsuitable investment strategies in four other cases pending before FINRA. The claimants allege that Klein misrepresented the level of risk and used margins to leverage managed accounts. Past allegations faced by Klein have dealt with Zero Coupon Treasury bond (Zero Coupon Treasuries).

How to Find An FINRA Securities Attorney to Assist in Your Investment/Broker Case

December 10, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

You’ve gone over your account statements and start to suspect that your broker hasn’t invested your assets appropriately. What should you do? The first step is to compile all of your documents and correspondence with your broker. You should collect your monthly account statements, opening account documents, and any written communication with your brokerage firm for starters. This will make it easier to assess your case.

Next, you should consult with an attorney. While not required, when you have securities claim, brokerage firms rarely settle claims with individuals without the assistance of an attorney. Most securities claims must be brought in arbitration before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), the broker-dealer regulator. A securities attorney can represent you during the arbitration or mediation proceedings and provide direction and advice on how to present your claim. Even if you do not choose to hire an attorney, brokerage firms usually hire counsel to represent them. If you cannot afford an attorney, many law firms offer contingency fee arrangements.

The SEC provides the following advice on finding an attorney who specializes in resolving securities complaints. If you need help in finding a lawyer who specializes in resolving securities complaints, you may want to try the following:

UBS Puerto Rico Bond Fund Sales Practices Come Under Fire

December 8, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

UBS Puerto Rico operates 23 proprietary non-exchange-traded closed-end funds (UBS Funds). UBS is one of the key players in the Puerto Rico municipal debt market and has packaged and sold approximately $10 billion in municipal debt through the UBS Funds.

It has been alleged that UBS marketed the UBS Funds to customers as income producing municipal bond funds that were designed to preserve investor principal. Over a number of years, UBS allegedly had its advisors over-concentrate thousands of its Puerto Rican clients in the UBS Funds. However, at the same time that UBS recommended the UBS Funds to clients, UBS allegedly liquidated its own UBS Fund assets due to the firm’s internal analysis that found that the Funds contained excessive risks.

Over the summer of 2013, the market for Puerto Rico’s $70 billion municipal debt began to evaporate. As the value of the UBS Funds has plummeted by 50-60% in value in a matter of months investor complaints filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Inc. (FINRA) have increased.

SEC Finds That Former JP Turner Broker Dimitrios Koutsoubos Engaged In Churning

December 2, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently found that broker Dimitrios Koutsoubos (Koutsoubos) churned the brokerage account of Teddy Bryant (Bryant). The SEC’s decision ordered Koutsoubos to: (1) cease and desist from committing fraud; (2) be barred from association with a broker, dealer, investment adviser, (3) disgorge $30,000 plus prejudgment interest, and (4) pay civil penalties of $130,000.

The SEC allegations against Koutsoubos also involved several other J.P. Turner & Company, LLC (JP Turner) registered representatives including Michael Bresner (Bresner), Ralph Calabro (Calabro), and James Konner (Konner). The SEC alleged that Calabro, Konner, and Koutsoubos between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, churned the accounts of seven customers by engaging in excessive trading for their own gains in disregard of their clients’ investment objectives and risk tolerances. The SEC claimed that Calabro, Konner, and Koutsoubos generated fees and commissions totaling around $845,000, for their benefit while the clients suffered aggregate losses of approximately $2,700,000.

JP Turner is a registered broker-dealer headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with two majority owners. From 2008 to 2009, JP Turner had approximately 200 small or one-person branch offices. Koutsoubos joined JP Turner in 2000 and left in 2009. Thereafter, Koutsoubos became employed with Caldwell International Securities Corporation.

Senator Warren proposes 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act

November 27, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

On November 12, 2013, Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that the “too big to fail” problem has only worsened since the 2008 financial crisis. JP Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., and Well Fargo & Co. each hold more than half of the total banking assets in the country. As large concentrations of wealth reside with a small number of banks, the possibility of another financial crisis looms unless certain reforms are implemented.

While the big banks become more concentrated and more complex, the Dodd-Frank Act’s implementation struggles. The agencies implementing the Dodd-Frank Act have missed more than 60% of the deadlines even though regulators continue to meet with various banks. Not only are regulators dragging their feet, but also the House recently passed two bills to delay provisions of the Dodd-Frank Acts. The Retail Investor Protection Act (RIPA) prevents the Department of Labor from defining circumstances under which an individual is considered a fiduciary. The Swaps Regulatory Improvement Act (SRIA) amends the swaps push-out requirement. The two bills passed by the House compound the delays of the regulatory implementation.

Although the House continues to hinder the Dodd-Frank Act, Senator Warren believes Congress needs to step in order to prevent another financial crisis. Senator Warren along with Senators John McCain, Maria Cantwell and Angus King urges the passage of the “21^st Century Glass-Steagall Act.” As Senator Warren stated, the new Glass-Steagall Act, “would reduce failures of the big banks by making banking boring, protecting deposits, and providing stability to the system even in bad times.”

SEC Order Finds That Former JP Turner Broker Jason Konner Engaged In Churning

November 22, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently found that broker Jason Konner (Konner) churned the brokerage account of James Carlson (Carlson). The SEC decision ordered Konner to: (1) cease and desist from committing fraud; (2) be barred from association with a broker, dealer, investment adviser, (3) disgorge $55,000 plus prejudgment interest, and (4) pay civil penalties of $150,000. In addition, at least three customer complaints have been initiated against Konner alleging churning, unsuitable investments, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty.

The SEC allegations against Konner also involved several other J.P. Turner & Company, LLC (JP Turner) registered representatives including Michael Bresner (Bresner), Ralph Calabro (Calabro), and Dimitrios Koutsoubos (Koutsoubos). The SEC alleged that Calabro, Konner, and Koutsoubos between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, churned the accounts of seven customers by engaging in excessive trading for their own gains in disregard of their clients’ investment objectives and risk tolerances. The SEC claimed that Calabro, Konner, and Koutsoubos generated charges totaling approximately $845,000, for their benefit while the clients suffered aggregate losses of approximately $2,700,000.

JP Turner is a registered broker-dealer headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with two majority owners. From 2008 to 2009, JP Turner had approximately 200 small or one-person branch offices. Konner joined JP Turner in 2006 and left in December 2011. Thereafter, Konner became employed with DPec Capital.

SEC Finds that Former JP Turner Broker Ralph Calabro Churned A Client’s Account

November 19, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently found that broker Ralph Calabro (Calabro) churned the brokerage account of Dudley Williams (Williams). The SEC decision ordered Calabro to: (1) cease and desist from committing fraud in violation of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5; (2) be barred from association with a broker, dealer, investment adviser, (3) disgorge $282,000 plus prejudgment interest, and (4) pay civil penalties of $150,000. In addition, at least six customer complaints have been initiated against Calabro alleging churning, unsuitable investments, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty.

The SEC allegations against Calabro also involved several other J.P. Turner & Company, LLC (JP Turner) registered representatives including Michael Bresner (Bresner), Jason Konner (Konner), and Dimitrios Koutsoubos (Koutsoubos). The SEC alleged that Calabro, Konner, and Koutsoubos between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2009, churned the accounts of seven customers by engaging in excessive trading for their own gains in disregard of their clients’ investment objectives and risk tolerances. The SEC alleged that Calabro, Konner, and Koutsoubos generated commissions, fees, and margin interest totaling approximately $845,000, while the clients suffered aggregate losses of approximately $2,700,000.

JP Turner is a registered broker-dealer headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with two majority owners. From 2008 to 2009, JP Turner had between 180 and 200 branch offices, most of which were small or one-person offices. There were approximately five hundred registered representatives in JP Turner’s offices in 2008 and 2009. Calabro joined JP Turner in 2004 and left in 2011. Thereafter, Calabro became associated with National Securities Corp. (National Securities) as a registered representative but not a securities principal. While at JP Turner, Calabro acted as a principal and registered representative in JP Turner’s Parlin, New Jersey office. Calabro’s customer base increased from ten in 2004 to seventy by 2010.

Broker James Tallant Suspended Over Allegations of Excessive Trading and Quantitative Unsuitable Investments

November 12, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended broker James Glenn Tallant (Tallant) for three months and fined him $15,000 including the disgorgement of $8,560.44 in commissions. FINRA alleged that Tallant exercised discretionary trading authority without written authorization in four securities accounts in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2510(b) and FINRA Rule 2010. In addition, FINRA found that Tallant engaged in excessive trading and quantitatively unsuitable in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2310 and IM-2310-2.

Tallant has been a registered representative with Morgan Stanley from 2005 through July 2013. FINRA alleged that Tallant’s securities violations involved a 49 years old woman, divorced, and with two children. The client owned and operated a women’s boutique clothing store and had an annual income of approximately $140,000 and an estimated net worth of approximately $300,000.

The client’s IRA account investment objectives capital appreciation and aggressive income. FINRA found that between March 2009, and March 2010, Tallant executed 39 purchase and sale securities transactions in the client’s individual account amounting to $147,366.50 with gross commissions totaling $8,739.56. In the client’s three other accounts Tallant’s trading totaled between $99,000 and $261,000 over the same time period. In 2009 alone, Tallant’s total gross commissions were $200,927.

What are Leveraged or Non-Traditional ETFs?

November 6, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

A leveraged Exchange Traded Fund (non-traditional or leveraged ETFs) is a security that employs debt, or leverage, in order to amplify the returns of an underlying stock position. Leveraged ETFs are generally available for most security indexes such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. A leveraged ETF with 300% leverage will return 3% if the underlying index returns 1%. Nontraditional ETFs can also be designed to return the inverse of the benchmark.

Leveraged ETFs are generally used only for short term trading. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) has warned that most leveraged ETFs reset daily, meaning that they are designed to achieve their stated objectives on a daily basis. As a result, the performance of nontraditional ETFs held over the long term can differ significantly from the performance of their underlying index or benchmark during the same period. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has acknowledged that leveraged ETF carry significant risks and are inherent complexity of the products. Accordingly, FINRA advises brokers that nontraditional ETFs are typically not suitable for retail investors.

Recently, FINRA sanctioned and suspended broker Michael E. French (French) over allegations that the broker recommended unsuitable transactions in leveraged and inverse ETFs in the accounts of elderly customers. FINRA also alleged that French held the leveraged ETFs in his customers’ accounts for extended periods contrary to Wells Fargo Advisor’s (Wells Fargo) written supervisory procedures.

Managed Futures Funds Erase Investor Gains with Excessive Fees

November 5, 2013 | by Staff Attorney

From January 2003 through the end of 2012, Morgan Stanley enticed over 30,000 customers to invest $797 million collectively into a managed-futures fund called Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Spectrum Technical L.P. The prospectus for Spectrum Technical fund characterized the fund as potentially profitable “when traditional markets are experiencing losses” and recommended the fund as a way to diversify beyond traditional stocks and bonds. The prospectus boasted that over a twenty-three year period, people who invested ten percent of their assets in managed futures outperformed portfolios comprised only of stocks and bonds.

The Spectrum Technical fund earned $490.3 million in trading gains and money-market interest income from 2003 through 2012. However, investors who remained in the fund during this period did not receive any of the returns because the commissions, expenses, and fees paid to fund managers and Morgan Stanley totaled $498.7 million. Thus, Spectrum Technical investors lost $8.3 million simply because the fees charged to the fund were greater than the gains.

Morgan Stanley advertised to clients that its managed futures funds performed well when the stock market was hit hard in 2000 and late 2007 and even gained 22.5 percent after fees in 2008. The firm further stated that it only sells these funds to qualified investors, and that it clearly defines the risks and fees for customers. Although these disclosures may provide insight as to the effect of fees on investor gains, information regarding fund managers’ conflicts of interest is often buried deep in the fund’s prospectus or regulatory filings.