Advisor Anthony Conti Subject to Complaints Over Investment Suitability

shutterstock_176284139-300x200The law offices of Gana Weinstein LLP is currently investigating advisor Anthony Conti (Conti), currently associated with Boenning & Scattergood, Inc. (Boenning & Scattergood) out of Carnegie, Pennsylvania.  According to a BrokerCheck report, Conti has been subject to at least one customer dispute during the course of his career.  According to records kept by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), Conti’s customer complaints concern allegations of unsuitable investments.

In October 2016 it was alleged that Conti’s previous employer, Ross, Sinclaire & Associates, LLC (RSA), three clients of RSA commenced an arbitration claim against the firm. The clients alleged that RSA misrepresented the safety and security of film tax credit notes purchased from the issuer, leading clients to believe their principal was not subject to significant risk. The clients allege that these misrepresentations and negligence caused the loss of principal.  The claim alleged $2,200,000 in damages.  This dispute is currently still pending.

Brokers are required under the securities laws to treat their clients fairly.  This obligation includes the duties to disclose material risks of the investments they recommend and to present products, particularly complex or confusing products, in a fair and balanced manner that allows the client to evaluate the recommendation.  Another important obligation advisors have is to make only suitable recommendations for investments to the client.  There are many investments that are not appropriate for the majority of investors or for certain investors given their risk tolerance, age, and other factors.  Advisors should not present these investment options to clients.  There are two screens that advisors must employ to determine whether an investment is suitable for a client.  First, there must be a reasonable basis for the recommendation – meaning that the product has been investigated and due diligence conducted into the investment’s features, benefits, risks, and other relevant factors.  The advisor must conclude that the investment is suitable for at least some investors and some securities may be suitable for no one.  Second, the broker then must match the investment as being appropriate for the customer’s specific investment needs and objectives such as the client’s retirement status, long or short term goals, age, disability, income needs, or any other relevant factor.

According to newsources, a study revealed that 7.3% of financial advisors had a customer complaint on their record when records from 2005 to 2015 were examined.  Brokers must publicly disclose reportable events on their BrokerCheck reports that include customer complaints, IRS tax liens, judgments, investigations, terminations, and criminal cases.  In addition, research has shown a disturbing pattern with troublesome brokers where brokers with high numbers of customer complaints are not kicked out of the industry but instead these brokers are sifted to lower quality brokerage firms with loose hiring practices and higher rates of customer complaints.  These lower quality firms may average brokers with five times as many complaints as the industry average.

Conti entered the securities industry in 1986. From December 2009 to June 2017, Conti was registered with Ross, Sinclaire & Associates.  Since June 2017 Conti has been employed by Boenning & Scattergood out of the firm’s Carnegie, Pennsylvania office location.

Investors who have suffered losses are encouraged to contact us at (800) 810-4262 for consultation.  At Gana Weinstein LLP, our attorneys are experienced representing investors who have suffered securities losses due to the mishandling of their accounts.  Claims may be brought in securities arbitration before FINRA.  Our consultations are free of charge and the firm is only compensated if you recover.

Contact Information