Close
Updated:

Broker Richard Marotzke in Berthel, Fisher & Company Financial Services, INC. Firm Has Customer Complaint

Previously financial advisor Richard Marotzke (Marotzke), previously employed by brokerage firm Berthel, Fisher & Company Financial Services, INC. has been subject to at least one disclosable event. These events include one customer complaint. According to a BrokerCheck reports most of the recent customer complaints concern either corporate debt securities or alternative investments such as direct participation products (DPPs) like business development companies (BDCs), non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs), oil & gas programs, annuities, and private placements.  The attorneys at Gana Weinstein LLP have represented hundreds of investors who suffered losses caused by these types of high risk, low reward products.

FINRA BrokerCheck shows a pending customer complaint on July 29, 2025.

The claimant alleges that the Firm and representative failed to make a suitable recommendation and over-concentrated claimant’s account in an oil & gas private placement and other unspecified investments in 2014. The claimant further allege that the Firm and representative misrepresented the investments and induced the claimant to retain the investment and cause them to suffer a loss.

DDPs feature investment options like non-traded REITs, oil and gas projects, equipment leasing products, and other alternative assets. These alternative investments virtually never profit investors and are almost always unsuitable for investors because of their high fee and cost structure. The extra commissions paid to brokers for selling these inferior investments create misleading incentives, driving an artificial demand for the products.

Several studies have confirmed that Non-traded REITs underperform publicly traded REITs with some showing that Non-Traded REITs cannot even beat safe benchmarks, like U.S. treasury bonds. It is the responsibility of brokers to inform investors that non-traded REITs deliver lower returns than treasuries and are both high risk and illiquid—but they frequently fail to do so. Because additional returns do not compensate investors for increased risk and illiquidity, these alternative investment products are hardly ever suitable for investors.

Brokers have a responsibility treat investors fairly which includes obligations such as making only suitable investments for the client after conducting due diligence. Due diligence includes an investigation into the investment’s properties including its benefits, risks, tax consequences, issuer, history, and other relevant factors. Appropriate due diligence would identify that an alternative investment’s high costs, illiquidity, and conflicts of interests that would make the investment not suitable for investors. Investors often fail to understand that they have lost money until many years after agreeing to the investment. In sum, for all of their costs and risks, investors in these programs are in no way additionally compensated for the loss of liquidity, risks, or cost.

Unfortunately, these types of alternative investment products continue to popular among brokers due to their high commissions. In order to counter the perverse incentives to sell these flawed product many states now limit investors from investing more than 10% of their liquid assets in Non-Traded REITs and BDCs. Many states impose these limitations because these investments do not benefit investors.

Marotzke has been in the securities industry for more than 13 years. Marotzke has been registered as a Broker with Berthel, Fisher & Company Financial Services, INC. since 2011.

Investors who have suffered losses are encouraged to contact us at (800) 810-4262 for consultation. At Gana Weinstein LLP, our attorneys are experienced representing investors who have suffered securities losses due to the mishandling of their accounts. Claims may be brought in securities arbitration before FINRA. Our consultations are free of charge and the firm is only compensated if you recover.

 

Contact Us